The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law
Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara tabled a privilege matter he said had been disallowed by the Speaker, along with a complaint made to the Bribery Commission against the Speaker. He alleged irregular payments for preliminary inquiry work far exceeding amounts permitted by a Public Administration circular, and raised concerns under the Anti-Corruption Act regarding misuse of state property and loss to the State. He also alleged improper use of both the Speaker’s official residence and another official apartment, and called on the President and Government to have the Speaker, and his Private Secretary, refrain from duties until investigations are concluded.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Presiding Member, under Standing Order 29(1), I attempted to raise a privilege matter today, but the Hon. Speaker did not allow it. That is entirely wrong; such a situation has never arisen in our parliamentary history. I therefore table the privilege matter I attempted to raise.
¶ 02 Next, I table a copy of the complaint submitted by Deputy Secretary-General Chaminda Kularatne to the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption against the Speaker.
¶ 03 Regarding preliminary inquiries and payments, a circular dated 24.10.2025 by the Secretary to the Ministry of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government permits Rs. 4,000 for preliminary inquiry reports and Rs. 1,000 for preparation of charges—a total of Rs. 5,000. But under the Speaker’s current procedure, Rs. 274,975 has been paid. I sought to question this. There are numerous alleged offences under Section 111 of the Anti-Corruption Act, No. 9 of 2023, including misuse of state property and causing loss to the State.
¶ 04 Another matter: unlawful use of two official residences. The Speaker has obtained an apartment at the Loris Road official housing complex under the Ministry of Public Administration, Provincial Councils and Local Government, and is also using the Speaker’s official residence. There is no entitlement to both, contrary to the Establishments Code and Cabinet decisions recognizing only three State official residences: for the President, the Prime Minister and the Speaker. The Speaker’s official residence is part of our institutional inventory and is not subject to rent. It cannot be allocated in anyone’s name. My request—until inquiries into these allegations are concluded—the Speaker should refrain from performing the duties of office, and his Private Secretary too should refrain accordingly.
¶ 05 [Expunged on the order of the Chair.]
¶ 06 We cannot continue to work while such matters hang over the Chair. This has never happened before. I urge the President and the Government to inform the Speaker to step aside from duties until these allegations are investigated and concluded. Otherwise, it will be difficult to work with him in the future. Thank you.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Thursday, 5 February 2026 ·No. 23269 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/13098
Cite as: The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 5 February 2026. No. 23269. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/13098