The Hon. Ananda Wijepala
Ananda Wijepala argued that the debate concerned transfers of Officers-in-Charge in the Police, not appointments, and said such transfers are lawful when powers are delegated by the National Police Commission under the Constitution. He cited previous Gazette notifications as precedents and stated that the President or Minister does not acquire these powers, while the IGP must follow Commission-set criteria and affected officers may appeal to the Commission. He rejected claims of politicization, contrasted current procedures with alleged past political influence in OIC appointments, and said the Government is strengthening police independence, discipline, promotions, resources, and rule-of-law enforcement.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Members, I am referring to some Members here—if you are not seated, please take your seats. From the 19th through the 21st Amendments, some acted without principle: they raised hands both to grant and to remove powers from Independent Commissions. The people know how this House behaved regarding the Independent Commissions. Presiding Member, we are not abolishing or reclaiming Commission powers. The proposal aligns with constitutional provisions. The NPC has the power; the President or Minister does not acquire it by Gazette.
¶ 02 On your proposal: decisions on granting powers rest with the NPC, as per the Constitution. There is nothing illegal. Numerous precedents exist: 25.11.2011 PSC Gazette; 06.05.2016 Gazette No. 1965/37; 06.02.2020 Gazette No. 2161/32. I table the Special Gazettes No. 1733/52 and 2161/32.
¶ 03 The current debate is about OIC transfers, not appointments. OIC posts are filled from SI, IP, or CI, and transfers are based on rank structure and performance. Your motion mentions “appointing OICs,” but what has been done are transfers. There are many precedents and Gazettes delegating transfer powers. This is lawful and, if powers are delegated, the IGP must apply Commission-set criteria. During your time, when 184 OICs were appointed, 182 were said to be on organizers’ recommendations—C.D. Wickramaratne said so. Do not mislead this House. The President has not demanded the NPC grant powers; the Constitution already allows the NPC to delegate based on its judgment. Delegation does not allow arbitrary use—criteria exist, including performance reports by supervising officers, pending charge sheets, and FR cases. Any OIC can appeal transfer decisions to the NPC. This is routine and constitutional and is a matter for the NPC, not the Ministry.
¶ 04 We will not politicize the Police. Previously, large parts of the Department were politicized—184 OICs appointed with 182 on political say-so. We have ended that. The Police now perform duties actively and fairly, enforcing the law equally. We will not allow politicization. We stood for Independent Commissions and institutional independence, and we will make institutions efficient with resources, promotions, and human capital. Nearly 400 officers have been interdicted this year where necessary. We are ensuring the rule of law. Thank you.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Friday, 10 October 2025 ·No. 22640 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/14013
Cite as: The Hon. Ananda Wijepala. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 10 October 2025. No. 22640. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/14013