10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Sunil Watagala, Attorney-at-Law - Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs

Jathika Jana balawegaya· Colombo· 10 October 2025 ·Adjournment: Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2))

Law & OrderCorruption & Governance ReformParliamentary Procedure
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Deputy Minister Sunil Watagala opposed the Opposition motion, arguing that delegation of police transfer powers by the National Police Commission through Gazette notification would be constitutional under Article 155G(2). He said affected officers already have appeal mechanisms through the NPC, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and fundamental rights jurisdiction, and defended the need for IGP discretion in deploying officers for operations against drugs and organized crime. He rejected newspaper-based allegations and crime claims as unproven, contending that the motion sought to pressure independent bodies such as the NPC, CIABOC and CID and lacked any identified illegality.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 [4.28 p.m.]

¶ 02 Hon. Presiding Member, this Opposition motion is like naming a child before it is born. Yesterday, when 20 Members stood, I thought the NPC must be violating the Constitution. But even the motion acknowledges that any delegation regarding transfers must be done by Gazette under Article 155G(2). Where is the illegality? None. If the NPC delegates by Gazette, it is constitutional.

¶ 03 If the IGP effects transfers after delegation, any aggrieved officer can appeal to the NPC under Article 155G(1), and beyond that, go to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, and if necessary, invoke Articles 17 and 126 for fundamental rights within a month. Where is the urgency?

¶ 04 Significant national operations are underway against drugs and organized crime. A head of department must have some discretion to deploy suitable officers to execute such operations. That is why the NPC’s lawful delegation framework exists.

¶ 05 Some are waving newspaper clippings as “evidence.” Hearsay in newspapers is not proof. Their apparent target is to attack the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption and the CID because those bodies, now free of political shackles, have the courage to act—even against powerful figures. When independent processes led to action involving Ranil Wickremesinghe, they panicked. That is why they rushed with this motion.

¶ 06 We even hear inflated crime statistics. They once manufactured the trope of a “shooting of the day”; now it has become “weeping of the day.” Speculation without evidence cannot guide this House.

¶ 07 Hon. Sujeewa Senasinghe, your own motion does not identify any illegality. Citing a constitutional provision and predicting a future commission or act is speculation. Do not intimidate the NPC into silence before its term ends. Constitutional acts are not automatically virtuous, but this one has a clear legal basis. Your motion has boomeranged—yesterday and today.

¶ 08 These orchestrated mud campaigns against the President and several Ministers lack any foundation. We reject them, and we reject this baseless motion. Thank you.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Friday, 10 October 2025 ·No. 22640 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/14018

Cite as: The Hon. Sunil Watagala, Attorney-at-Law - Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 10 October 2025. No. 22640. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/14018