10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney‑at‑Law - Minister of Justice and National Integration

Jathika Jana balawegaya· Colombo· 23 January 2026 ·Oral question: Standing Order 27(2) Questions: Attorney-General Independence, Gold Jewellery Return

Law & OrderJustice & Human Rights
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

The Minister replied to questions under Standing Order 27(2) on the appointment and independence of the Attorney-General, stating that the President appoints the Attorney-General only with Constitutional Council approval under Articles 41A(1) and 61E, a mechanism restored by the 21st Amendment. He said the Government acts within existing constitutional and statutory safeguards, including the removal procedures in Act No. 5 of 2002, to prevent arbitrary removal and ensure due process. He added that criticisms of the Attorney-General and other public bodies are recognized as expressions of opinion, but the Government would take lawful measures if such opinions affect the Attorney-General’s independence.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Speaker, replies to the Hon. Leader of the Opposition under Standing Order 27(2):

¶ 02 1) Yes. 2) Yes. Under Article 41A(1) of the 1978 Constitution, the President recommends to the Constitutional Council, and upon its approval, appoints the Attorney‑General. Further, this requirement that the President appoints the AG only with CC approval is also affirmed under Article 61E of the Constitution. 3) Yes. The 21st Amendment reinstated the Constitutional Council approval mechanism to ensure the AG’s appointment is independent of direct executive influence—a strong democratic check safeguarding impartiality and independence. 4) Yes. Under existing constitutional and statutory provisions, this Government acts progressively and responsibly to ensure the AG’s independence. 5) Section 3 of Act No. 5 of 2002 sets out grounds for removal of an AG; Section 4(1) vests determination on the President upon due notice/charges; Section 4(2) prescribes the procedure. These provisions guard against arbitrary removal and address misconduct via due process. 6) Any public office holder faces criticisms from time to time. Recently, even decisions of the Judicial Service Commission faced scrutiny here and on social media. Regarding views expressed about the AG’s discharge of duties, the Government has observed such opinions but has not verified their truth or falsity. We recognize freedom of expression. 7) If any such opinions are observed to affect the AG’s independence, the Government will take all necessary measures, in accordance with the prevailing law, to protect that independence.

¶ 03 Additionally, unlike past instances where stones were thrown at law officers’ houses, posters vilified them, or impeachment was pursued against the Chief Justice, this Government acts strictly according to law.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Friday, 23 January 2026 ·No. 23290 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/14348

Cite as: The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney‑at‑Law - Minister of Justice and National Integration. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 23 January 2026. No. 23290. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/14348