The Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake
Chamara Sampath Dasanayake raised concerns on behalf of Law College candidates about confusion over responsibility for re-scrutinization, with the Law College and the Department allegedly referring candidates to each other. He requested a timely resolution to avoid candidates losing another year, noting that seats remain vacant. He clarified that the Motion addresses inconsistencies in examination administration and does not challenge the admission authority of the Chief Justice and the Council.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees, to clarify: this is not my personal view but an appeal brought by the Law College candidates themselves—even travelling from Polonnaruwa. There is a contradictory situation: the Law College says re-scrutinization is with the Department; the Department says it is with the Law College. We request resolution without wasting another year, especially when seats remain vacant. This Motion concerns inconsistencies in exam administration, not overriding admission authority, which we accept rests with the Chief Justice and the Council.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Tuesday, 23 September 2025 ·No. 1758876121024768 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/15642
Cite as: The Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 23 September 2025. No. 1758876121024768. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/15642