The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna
Raised a point under Standing Order 91(h), asking for clarification on whether criticism of a proposal and the tabling of material about the promotion of certain tourism content could be treated as reference to personal affairs. He maintained that the remarks concerned Government policy and the propriety of a proposal, not imputations of improper motives or personal matters involving another Member.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Sir, Standing Order 91(h) states: “No Member shall make any imputation of improper motives against another Member, or make reference to personal affairs of another Member.” Please clarify. We never spoke about personal affairs; we said only that a proposal was wrong. We also tabled material relating to the promotion of certain tourism content. We are questioning Government policy, not anyone’s personal affairs.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Tuesday, 6 January 2026 ·No. 23111 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/17627
Cite as: The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 6 January 2026. No. 23111. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/17627