The Hon. Susantha Dodawatta, Attorney-at-Law
Hon. Susantha Dodawatta supported the Supplementary Estimate to provide school stationery allowances, saying it addressed an immediate need among underprivileged children while reflecting deeper failures in the education system. He argued that past policy had left education poorly aligned with skills and employment, citing unemployment, qualification mismatches and the number of three-wheeler drivers as evidence. He contrasted the previous National Education Policy Framework with the Government’s stated aim to take greater responsibility for education costs, reduce burdens on families, and expand vocational education after Grade 9. He also linked education reform to producing ethical citizens and strengthening the productive economy.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Deputy Speaker, at a time we are debating a Supplementary Estimate to grant an allowance for school stationery—and with many schoolchildren in the gallery—I consider it a privilege to address the Tenth Parliament.
¶ 02 Providing allowances now to underprivileged children is essential. But let us note: stationery is a basic physical need in education. The present necessity arises because of the condition to which past rulers dragged our education system; some who supported those policies still sit here.
¶ 03 Education is an investment. As Yuval Noah Harari said: “Education is the best investment humans can make in themselves, not to accumulate data, but to develop mental resilience and emotional intelligence to face the uncertain future.” The State spends taxpayers’ money on education; parents spend their money, time, and labour; and children invest years of their lives. The question: has this investment yielded results?
¶ 04 Unemployment reached 4.7 percent in 2023. By 2024, 1,184,416 are employed as three-wheeler drivers—often unrelated to their education. Another 4.4 percent work in jobs mismatched to their qualifications. This shows we have not achieved expected outcomes; education has not been purposefully aligned to identified skills and pathways.
¶ 05 An Opposition MP before me shed crocodile tears over education. The Government he represented introduced the National Education Policy Framework to reduce the State’s burden in education and facilitate the State’s withdrawal.
¶ 06 Our current Government’s policy is the opposite: to assume, in the future, the full burden of education that now rests on the public. The financial, time, and labour burdens on families have adversely affected the productive economy; reducing that will benefit the economy. We will also direct children above Grade 9 into vocational education, creating a skilled generation to strengthen the economy.
¶ 07 The primary aim of education is to produce fulfilled, empathetic citizens with a developed cultural and moral fabric. Our politics has failed here. If our system produced such citizens, then in cases like the bond scam—where public funds were misused—there would not be attempts to justify it with publications. Similarly, duty-evading vehicle registrations deprived the State of revenue for education, health, and essentials—yet cases are not pursued.
¶ 08 Under our Government, education will be developed, and through it, the productive economy we envisage will be strengthened. As mandated by the people, we will build a prosperous country and a dignified life by nurturing empathetic, morally grounded citizens.
¶ 09 Thank you.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Tuesday, 17 December 2024 ·No. 1734685396083959 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/18212
Cite as: The Hon. Susantha Dodawatta, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 17 December 2024. No. 1734685396083959. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/18212