The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara
Harshana Nanayakkara briefly responded to a remark made by Hon. Chamindranee Kiriella in his absence, seeking to clarify the basis on which she claimed the right to use the title “Attorney-at-Law.” He questioned the duration and grounds of her claimed legal qualification, asking for correction if his understanding was wrong.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Thank you. I will take one minute. I briefly left the Chamber for a discussion; during that time Hon. Chamindranee Kiriella mentioned my name. Let me clarify. Hon. Member, you were not here then. If I am wrong, correct me. You claimed that because you worked for a year there, you can use “Attorney-at-Law.” How many years?
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Tuesday, 17 December 2024 ·No. 1734685396083959 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/18248
Cite as: The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 17 December 2024. No. 1734685396083959. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/18248