The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake
Hon. Bimal Rathnayake raised a point of order concerning the use of Standing Orders by Members seeking to speak when their names are mentioned. He referred to Standing Order 91(3), stating that a response is warranted only in cases involving improper imputations or references to personal affairs, and not merely because a Member’s name has been mentioned.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees, I rise to a point of Order. I refer to the use of Standing Orders to seek the floor merely because one’s name was mentioned. Standing Orders clearly state that merely mentioning a name does not automatically entitle a Member to speak. I draw the House’s attention to Standing Order 91(3) regarding improper imputations or references to personal affairs; only in such context is a response warranted. I note this because, although the intervention was useful, there is no automatic right to speak merely upon one’s name being mentioned.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Tuesday, 17 December 2024 ·No. 1734685396083959 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/18306
Cite as: The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 17 December 2024. No. 1734685396083959. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/18306