10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Arjuna Sujeewa Senasinghe, Attorney-at-Law

Samagi Jana Balawegaya· National List· 14 November 2025 ·Procedural: Procedural Matters: Standing Order 91(k) and Points of Order

Women & ChildrenParliamentary Procedure
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Hon. Arjuna Sujeewa Senasinghe made a personal clarification regarding remarks made against him during a Point of Order raised on 12 November 2025, stating that he had not targeted or named any woman Member and had instead spoken about protecting Members and safeguarding the dignity of women Members. He argued that the Member who made the allegation had raised an unrelated issue during the Budget Debate, named other Members in a way that caused difficulty, and should apologize to them. He also referred to a controversy over a woman linked to a Member’s foreign visit, welcomed the President’s decision to stop the travel, and requested that the description of him as “anti-women” be expunged from the Hansard.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Speaker, on 2025.11.12 in Parliament, under Standing Order 92(u)2, a Point of Order was raised by a certain lady Member and hostile remarks were made against me regarding a matter to which she had no connection.

¶ 02 At no time did I target or name any lady Member and make such a statement. I spoke about the protection of Members and urged that the dignity of lady Members be safeguarded.

¶ 03 A lady Member, unconnected to the matter, was allowed more than five minutes to speak in the middle of the Budget Debate, whereas some members do not even get five minutes. At that time, the Chief Government Whip and the Leader of the House were present, as well as the lady Member who claimed that such an allegation had been made. None of them stated that I had done any such thing — because I had not.

¶ 04 Furthermore, in that speech, names of Members from the Second and Third Parties were mentioned, placing them in difficulty. It is the lady Member who should apologize to them, not I.

¶ 05 After controversies regarding a woman who was to travel abroad for a Member’s foreign visit, His Excellency the President stopped the travel. We thank the President for setting that example to the Government side. The President would also have acted out of concern for her safety; we do not know what coercion she may have faced. She has been subjected to public vilification and social media attacks because of that event.

¶ 06 Those speaking on women’s rights should have stood up for her. We did not see that. The lady Member in question even called me “anti-women”. Such statements should be expunged from the Hansard. Thank you for allowing me to make this clarification.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Friday, 14 November 2025 ·No. 22848 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/20641

Cite as: The Hon. Arjuna Sujeewa Senasinghe, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 14 November 2025. No. 22848. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/20641