10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. U.P. Abeywickrama, Attorney-at-Law

Jathika Jana balawegaya· Gampaha· 24 September 2025 ·Debate: Debate: Penal Code (Amendment) Bill - Second Reading

Justice & Human RightsCorruption & Governance ReformWomen & Children
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Hon. U.P. Abeywickrama supported the Penal Code (Amendment) Bill as part of the Government’s wider legal reform agenda and said the colonial-era Penal Code must be modernized in line with contemporary child rights standards. He urged Members to engage substantively because courts may use Hansard to interpret legislative intent, and rejected Opposition claims that the Bill would victimize teachers or elders. He also denied allegations of Government interference in the judiciary, police, or independent commissions, contrasting the current administration’s approach with past instances of politicization, and called for support for the reform process.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Presiding Member, this Penal Code (Amendment) Bill advances both children’s rights and our Government’s broader vision of legal reform for social transformation, as outlined in our NPP policy.

¶ 02 The Legislature frames policy and law; the future of people’s rights depends on how the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary function. The Penal Code, introduced in 1883 during colonial times, must be updated to meet modern realities, including global norms on children’s rights.

¶ 03 I regret that some in the Opposition used sarcasm and personal jibes instead of engaging substantively, trying to sow distrust among teachers and other groups, rather than focusing on values this law will embed.

¶ 04 When Parliament passes laws, courts later interpret them, often drawing on Hansard to discern legislative intent. Hence debates should be substantive from both Government and Opposition.

¶ 05 Historically, many constitutional amendments (since 1978) served narrow political ends, barring a few like the 13th and 19th. Our approach is different: we bring reforms the people need.

¶ 06 The Opposition alleges legislative authoritarianism. But history shows who politicized institutions and attacked the judiciary—stones thrown at judges’ houses, the removal of Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, the Mohan Peiris saga, and even comments by a former Chief Justice about “Helping Hambantota.” Since coming to power, we have not interfered with the judiciary, police, or independent commissions. Those institutions suffered from prior politicization, not ours.

¶ 07 An Opposition Member tried to cast suspicion on JSC postings and promotions. That reflects their own past methods. Our Government does not condone or engage in such practices. The police and investigative agencies are working effectively against narcotics and crime; those threatened now cry “political interference.”

¶ 08 This amendment is one step toward our goal of a “prosperous country—beautiful lives.” It is not about victimizing teachers or elders; it is about creating a more refined society. I urge all to join this reform path with an open mind.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Wednesday, 24 September 2025 ·No. 1759815459006615 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/20868

Cite as: The Hon. U.P. Abeywickrama, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 24 September 2025. No. 1759815459006615. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/20868