The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna

Independent Group 17 - Jaffna· Jaffna· 24 September 2025 ·Debate: Debate: Penal Code (Amendment) Bill - Second Reading

Parliamentary Procedure

AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Raised a point of order under Standing Order 92(2), questioning why an unlisted Government Member was permitted to raise a point of order. He alleged inconsistent application of procedure, referring to a previous instance in which he was ordered out for raising a point of order.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Sir, I rise to a point of order under Standing Order 92(2). How was a point of order allowed to her? She was not listed to speak; there must be a reason. I was once ordered out for raising a point of order—why is there one rule for Government, another for us?

Provenance

Source: Hansard, Wednesday, 24 September 2025 ·No. 1759815459006615 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column: not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink: /lk/speeches/20890

View source PDF ↗ Suggest a correction

Cite as: The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 24 September 2025. No. 1759815459006615. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/20890