The Hon. Najith Indika

¶ 01 Hon. Presiding Member, we are debating the Government motion to postpone business regarding education reforms. Given last week’s talk of a no-confidence motion against the Prime Minister, those Members now praise her, so we have brought this motion to proceed with reforms.

¶ 02 Errors and shortcomings have been discussed: notably the English module web link issue — investigations are ongoing, with interim measures like interdictions and compulsory leave. But some have used these to craft malicious narratives.

¶ 03 Reforms must go forward with the confidence of all; we must clear doubts so that even the remaining 10% accept them. That takes time.

¶ 04 I wish to comment on the SJB’s conduct. The Leader of the Opposition called for an intellectual debate; we agreed. But what we saw were attempts to drag the discussion into abuse and vulgarity, not substantive critique.

¶ 05 Earlier, they claimed History and Aesthetics were excluded. Once shown they are included, that line ended. Then came the English web link issue — a serious matter, accepted as such, hence three inquiries. After that, they claimed the Dharma Chakra depiction was wrong and religion was being destroyed. I have here a recommendation dated 2024.08.29 from the Editorial Board of the Tripitaka Summary, chaired by six Royal Panditha monks, recommending the exact Dharma Chakra used in the book; the same symbol was used on commemorative coins during the Sambuddhatva Jayanthi. I table those documents. Therefore, that argument has no basis.

¶ 06 Next came claims that a rainbow on a book cover promotes homosexuality. In our time, textbooks also had rainbows. This is a poor criticism. Instead of addressing genuine pedagogical points, they dragged the debate into sexualized, obscene territory, even circulating an Australian textbook page unrelated to Sri Lanka.

¶ 07 A hateful campaign was waged against the Prime Minister/Education Minister. We appreciate opposition Members like Hon. Gajendrakumar and the TNA who stated they would not join such attacks. On child abuse or violence against women, we must all stand together.

¶ 08 Now, after stirring fear, they pivot to say they also want an “intellectual debate.” Prove it through action, not words. Bring your no-confidence motion; when the Prime Minister returns next week, put it and let the House vote. Then you will see where confidence truly lies.

¶ 09 The Government’s stance is clear: we will develop human resources, physical resources, and proceed so as to produce more rational, evidence-minded citizens — not those swayed by conspiracies about rainbow covers. Those who constantly sexualize every topic should consider seeking mental health advice. Do not degrade the nation’s children with vulgarity. Thank you.