The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva
Hon. Harsha de Silva disputed the Deputy Minister’s claims on tax relief, arguing that several measures presented as concessions—such as double taxation relief, taxation on net income, and quarterly payments—were standard tax practices. He said the Government had failed to remove food taxes as promised and was still collecting revenue through the Special Commodity Levy, while also imposing higher taxes on domestic software income and small foreign-earning digital creators. He also criticized the Deputy Minister’s attribution of Central Bank interest rate reductions to the Government and called for legal action, rather than repeated allegations, against politicians accused of corruption.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Speaker, in five minutes it is difficult to cover much.
¶ 02 I listened to the Deputy Minister. He sought credit even for Central Bank interest rate reductions, despite having opposed Central Bank independence legislation and insulting the Governor. Give credit where due.
¶ 03 He says the first slab moved from Rs. 100,000 to Rs. 150,000 and that 12 per cent was removed so it goes 6 per cent then 18 per cent. That is what he touts.
¶ 04 He stated six points. First, “It was 30 per cent; we made it 15 per cent.” I earlier questioned whether this is corporate or personal. I will not repeat. But what happened? Your book says you would remove taxes on food items. You did not; you still expect Rs. 13.6 billion from food. That is where the 30 down to 15 calculation is offset. If it had remained at 30, they expected Rs. 13.6 billion; at 15, Rs. 6.8 billion. But since you did not remove the Special Commodity Levy on food, you still get Rs. 13.6 billion. So tell the truth: you did not remove the food taxes, and you pass 16 tax items today including the SCL on food.
¶ 05 Second, double taxation relief is not new; many DTTs exist. If 12 per cent is paid abroad and the domestic rate is 15, then 3 per cent is due — that is standard.
¶ 06 Third, tax is not on gross but on net after costs — that is standard for consultants, architects, etc.; not a new concession.
¶ 07 Fourth, claiming “no one pays 36 per cent” is wrong. Domestic earnings face up to 36 per cent. Your book promised zero on domestic software; now you tax at 36 per cent. A small YouTube channel with foreign viewers now faces 15 per cent; earlier it was near zero. For domestic sales, you levy up to 36 per cent.
¶ 08 Fifth, quarterly payments and year-end settlement is not a new relief; that is how we all pay.
¶ 09 Finally, if politicians have stolen, arrest them; do not keep chanting.
¶ 10 Thank you.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Thursday, 20 March 2025 ·No. 1746596381071973 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/24121
Cite as: The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 20 March 2025. No. 1746596381071973. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/24121