The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna
Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna objected to being limited to 30 seconds, stating that a point of order should be allowed one minute. He alleged that his phone was tapped in 2021 and that on the 23rd his party Leader wrote to the Police seeking his arrest without informing him, claiming the Leader was acting on another agenda.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Why 30 seconds? A point of order is entitled to a minute. On the 31st there was a DCC meeting. In 2021, my phone was tapped. On the 23rd our Leader wrote to the Police to arrest me, without informing me. Since then, our Leader has been acting on your agenda. That is completely wrong. To arrest me—
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Wednesday, 5 March 2025 ·No. 1742473561091594 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/2424
Cite as: The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 5 March 2025. No. 1742473561091594. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/2424