Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva

Samagi Jana Balawegaya· Colombo· 22 February 2025 ·Debate: Appropriation Bill 2025 - Second Reading Debate (Fifth Allotted Day)

Parliamentary Procedure

AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva disputed the prior characterization of a ruling or assurance, stating that the issue was not merely to be “looked into” but that it had been said the relevant remarks would be expunged or removed from the Hansard. His intervention sought clarification on the parliamentary record and the handling of statements in Hansard.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 No, no. You did not say you would look into it. You said it would be expunged from the Hansard. You said it would be removed from the Hansard.

Provenance

Source: Hansard, Saturday, 22 February 2025 ·No. 1741001658041256 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column: not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink: /lk/speeches/25075

View source PDF ↗ Suggest a correction

Cite as: Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 22 February 2025. No. 1741001658041256. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/25075