10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. (Ms.) Lakmali Hemachandra, Attorney-at-Law

Jathika Jana balawegaya· National List· 20 May 2025 ·Debate: Debate: Order under the Excise (Special Provisions) Act - Electric Vehicle Tax Revision (Continued)

Public FinanceEnvironment
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

The Member stated that the Gazette debated was issued on 31 January 2025 as part of the tax policy formulated when vehicle imports were permitted, and is now before Parliament for approval after consideration by the Committee on Public Finance. She rejected claims that it was a new or reversed policy, explaining that it includes excise measures on electric vehicles. She argued that the increased EV excise is intended to address declining revenue as EV imports rise, while maintaining that the overall tax burden on EVs remains lower than on petrol and diesel vehicles.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Presiding Member, thank you for the opportunity.

¶ 02 This Gazette we debate today was issued on 31 January 2025. I mention the date because from this morning several Opposition MPs spoke as if this were a new Gazette, saying we lack a proper tax policy and that we reverse Gazettes. That is not so.

¶ 03 When the Government decided to allow vehicle imports, we simultaneously formulated the tax policy. That policy was gazetted on 31 January 2025. As a money regulation, under the Constitution and the law it must be placed before Parliament for approval. Accordingly, it was discussed at the Committee on Public Finance last week and is now before Parliament.

¶ 04 Some Opposition MPs speak without any understanding of the process, treating this as a newly issued Gazette. I must clearly state this is the tax policy decided when allowing imports, now presented for Parliamentary approval.

¶ 05 This Gazette contains three elements. The most notable two relate to electric vehicles: the imposition of an Excise Tax. Generally, excise taxes are imposed where there is a potential negative externality. However, the regulation here doubles the existing excise on EVs.

¶ 06 This has been misinterpreted repeatedly as “discouraging” EVs and as contrary to renewable energy policy. But the reason for doubling EV excise is this: there has been a global shift in vehicle production away from fossil fuel vehicles towards EVs. EVs are increasingly used and imported into Sri Lanka. As volumes rise while EVs carry relatively lower overall tax incidence, government revenue declines. To address the revenue gap associated with higher EV volumes, the excise was increased.

¶ 07 Even after considering VAT, Customs Duty, and Luxury Tax, the total tax burden on EVs remains lower than on petrol or diesel vehicles. Therefore, this does not discourage EV usage. With market shifts and changing consumer preferences, if revenue falls, this Gazette allows us to recover it. For example, Luxury Tax is about 120 percent of value on diesel, 100 percent on petrol, and around 60 percent on EVs. So one must consider total tax incidence.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 ·No. 1749010823009957 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/25934

Cite as: The Hon. (Ms.) Lakmali Hemachandra, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 20 May 2025. No. 1749010823009957. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/25934