10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Ajith P. Perera

Samagi Jana Balawegaya· Kalutara· 20 February 2026 ·Oral question: Oral Question: Three-Judge Anti-Corruption Permanent High Court (Q.1/1206/2024)

Justice & Human RightsCorruption & Governance Reform
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Hon. Ajith P. Perera referred to the 2018 Judicature Amendment and the establishment of Permanent High Courts-at-Bar for day-to-day trials in serious cases, stating that such references are made on the gravity of offences with the Chief Justice’s approval. He questioned why the part-heard case against former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa over alleged use of public funds for his parents’ memorial, withdrawn during his presidency due to immunity, has not been recommenced after that immunity ended. He asked whether the Government has discussed the matter with the Attorney-General and what steps will be taken to re-file and proceed with the case.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Mr. Speaker, the Judicature Amendment of 2018 provided for day-to-day trials to prevent dilatory tactics by accused in such cases. Facilities must be provided to counsel, judges and witnesses accordingly. The Permanent High Courts-at-Bar were established for this purpose, including a dedicated building opposite the Sri Lanka Law College. Under the 2018 law with the Chief Justice’s approval, references for trial-at-bar are made based on the gravity of the offence, not political vendetta.

¶ 02 After the Permanent High Courts were set up, there was a case against former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa regarding the construction of his parents’ memorial using public funds. Midway through the trial, the accused went abroad on medical grounds, later returned, became President, and the case was withdrawn under presidential immunity. He no longer has immunity. Why has that part-heard case not been recommenced for over a year? Will the Government take steps to have it re-filed and proceeded with? Have you discussed this with the Attorney-General, and what actions are being taken?

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Friday, 20 February 2026 ·No. 23331 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/29873

Cite as: The Hon. Ajith P. Perera. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 20 February 2026. No. 23331. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/29873