10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Ravi Karunanayake

New Democratic Front· National List· 23 July 2025 ·Procedural: Procedural: Standing Order 27(2) – Simplified VAT (SVAT) Abolition

Public FinanceEmploymentForeign Affairs
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Ravi Karunanayake raised concerns under Standing Order 27(2) about the planned abolition of the Simplified VAT scheme from 1 October 2025, reportedly linked to IMF EFF commitments, and its replacement with a 45-day VAT refund system. He argued that exporters face serious cash-flow risks due to past Inland Revenue refund delays, new US tariff pressures, and possible loss of competitiveness, and asked what safeguards, audit mechanisms, impact assessments, and transition policies the Government has prepared. He also requested that IMF recommendations and the Government’s abolition plan be presented to Parliament, and asked whether bridging facilities such as credit lines, VAT offsets, or interim payment channels would be provided for MSMEs and exporters.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Speaker, I seek leave under Standing Order 27(2).

¶ 02 Effective from 1 October 2025 the Simplified VAT (SVAT), a vital tool supporting exporters’ cash flow, is to be abolished reportedly under IMF EFF policy directives. The alternative is a VAT refund system with a 45-day processing assurance. Exporters have serious concerns due to Inland Revenue Department’s historical refund delays — some pending since 2007.

¶ 03 Compounding this, new universal US tariffs reduce Sri Lankan competitiveness. Japan has a 15% deal with the US; Vietnam 20%; the Philippines 19%; India 15–18%; I hear Indonesia 19%.

¶ 04 Exports are critical to recovery, FX stability and jobs. Abruptly scrapping SVAT without a tested refund mechanism risks cash-flow crises, closures and loss of competitiveness. Companies are shifting to Dubai, the Bahamas, Malaysia, etc.

¶ 05 Accordingly, I ask:

¶ 06 1. On what basis is the Government abolishing SVAT amid such economic conditions, given exporters’ distrust of IRD refunds? 2. What legal, administrative and technological safeguards ensure the promised 45-day refunds? I hear a risk assessment limited to 10–15 companies first — this alarms exporters. 3. Can a third-party audit mechanism or certification be introduced to protect exporters from refund delays? 4. Has the Government assessed impacts on specific exporters whose revenues depend on immediate payments? 5. What policies have been adopted to avoid disruption to business operations during the transition? 6. Can IRD deploy a fully developed and tested risk-based VAT refund system that guarantees timely refunds? 7. Will the IMF recommendations and the Government’s plan to abolish SVAT, and all related information, be presented to Parliament? 8. Considering MSMEs’ cash-flow vulnerabilities, is the Government ready to introduce bridging facilities such as tied credit lines, VAT offset mechanisms or interim payment channels?

¶ 07 Thank you.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Wednesday, 23 July 2025 ·No. 1754386160089643 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/4139

Cite as: The Hon. Ravi Karunanayake. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 23 July 2025. No. 1754386160089643. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/4139