The Hon. Amirthanathan Adaikkalanathan

¶ 01 Hon. Presiding Member, I am pleased to join this debate on extending Emergency purportedly to assist disaster-affected people. Everyone asks: why is Emergency needed to provide relief and rehabilitation?

¶ 02 In our areas, tensions have arisen between Grama Sevaka officers and people, including those whose homes were not flooded but who demand benefits, leading to disputes. If the Government is truly managing relief, why extend Emergency? In the immediate aftermath, all—officials and public—helped quickly, and we appreciate that. But no one has clearly explained what exactly Emergency will be used for now. Do you need Emergency to deliver relief and rebuild? Our people fear Emergency and the PTA because youths—including your party’s supporters—were punished under these laws and some remain in prison.

¶ 03 On cybercrime: the IGP said action is being taken against online offenders. Many operate via anonymous sites, defaming women as prostitutes, morphing images and posting them. When victims complain, police say they lack capacity, especially if perpetrators are abroad. The Government must equip law enforcement to handle cybercrimes properly, or they will remain unchecked.

¶ 04 On banned fishing methods: if you plan to prohibit a method, give time for transition. In Mannar—Thalaimannar, Pesalai, Puthukudiyiruppu, Thalvupadu, Vankalai, Karisal, Pallimunai, Mullikulam—many rely on shore-seine (karai valai) operations employing thousands. If you halt it immediately, workers and investors will be harmed. Provide at least six months for people to shift livelihoods.

¶ 05 Thank you.