The Hon. Kabir Hashim
Kabir Hashim criticized the Government’s tax policy and the regulation under the amended Strategic Development Projects Act, arguing that it remains insufficiently transparent and could allow discretionary tax concessions despite the 2025 reforms. He cited concerns raised by the Committee on Public Finance and questioned why tourism projects receive longer tax holidays than manufacturing and ICT if the Government prioritizes a production economy. He also argued that increased tourist arrivals have not translated into strong net earnings, citing lower per-tourist spending and foreign exchange leakages. He further opposed the SSCL and the reduced VAT registration threshold, saying these cascading tax burdens would affect small businesses and consumers amid high operating costs.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Mr. Deputy Speaker, hearing the Hon. Deputy Minister try to justify the new taxes, I felt sorry for him. Regardless of the rhetoric, the costs ultimately come from the people’s pockets.
¶ 02 On the Strategic Development Projects Act (SDPA): it was introduced in 2008 under Mahinda Rajapaksa and was criticized by the JVP then as opaque, corruption-prone, unfair to domestic industry, and overly generous to foreign investors. Ironically, in 2025 the JVP Government passed the SDPA (Amendment) Act No. 26 to create a rules-based framework and curb discretionary, political decisions.
¶ 03 However, the Committee on Public Finance (COPF), chaired by Hon. Harsha de Silva, has raised objections to the regulation brought today under the amended SDPA, stating it is inconsistent with the 2025 reform’s objectives. For example, Category “A” grants 6–10 year tax holidays for foreign investors in tourism, while giving only five years to manufacturing and ICT. If we talk about building a production economy, on what basis do we privilege tourism over manufacturing?
¶ 04 Transparency is lacking: even after the 2025 amendment, “Strategic Development Project” is not clearly defined, allowing latitude to label projects as SDPs and grant tax holidays—creating a tool for abuse and favoritism. Where is the “system change”?
¶ 05 On tourism, the Government boasts about growth. In 2024, arrivals were 2.0 million; in 2025, 2.3 million—an increase of 0.3 million. But earnings rose only from USD 3.1 billion (2024) to USD 3.2 billion (2025)—a mere USD 100 million. Per tourist per day spending fell from USD 178 (2024) to USD 140 (2025). Moreover, USD 1.3 billion leaked back out in 2025. So, despite higher arrivals, net gains are weak.
¶ 06 Meanwhile, domestic businesses face cascading levies. The SSCL is a cascading tax that burdens consumers. You’ve lowered the VAT registration threshold from Rs. 60 million to Rs. 36 million, pushing small retailers—village groceries, vegetable, meat and fish vendors—into VAT, ultimately burdening consumers. This is the time to support domestic producers facing high fuel, electricity, transport and interest costs, not to raise taxes on them.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Tuesday, 7 April 2026 ·No. 23476 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/537
Cite as: The Hon. Kabir Hashim. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 7 April 2026. No. 23476. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/537