The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law
Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara denied allegations attributed to Hon. Mujibur Rahuman, stating that the deceased’s wife had not made any police complaint regarding the matter. He rejected claims involving “Asela, the Secretary” as false and challenged Hon. Rahuman to table the relevant letter and specify the police station and date of any alleged complaint.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Deputy Speaker, I am not the one who lied to court; it is Hon. Mujibur Rahuman. Why? I repeat today that at no time did the deceased’s wife make a complaint to the police in this regard. What he says that “Asela, the Secretary, said so” is also false. He wants to distort these facts. Therefore, I reject that claim again today. I challenge Hon. Mujibur Rahuman: table that letter. In addition, tell me to which police station and on what date the wife made such a complaint. Because nothing of that sort happened.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Wednesday, 6 May 2026 ·No. 23541 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/5532
Cite as: The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 6 May 2026. No. 23541. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/5532