The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law
Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara disputed claims that a woman had lodged a police complaint alleging her husband’s death was suspicious. He challenged the opposing Member to provide the relevant police station and date, and asserted that the allegations made were baseless.
Verbatim record (translated)
Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English¶ 01 Hon. Deputy Speaker, what I said previously, I say again today. This lady has never, at any time, made a complaint to the police. I only challenge him to tell me the police station and the date if she did complain that her husband’s death was suspicious. Therefore, the one telling untruths here is either Hon. Mujibur Rahuman or— [Expunged on the order of the Chair.] I state that all three of those assertions are baseless.
Provenance
- Source
- Hansard, Wednesday, 6 May 2026 ·No. 23541 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
- Page · column
- not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
- Permalink
/lk/speeches/5542
Cite as: The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 6 May 2026. No. 23541. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/5542