10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Sajith Premadasa - Leader of the Opposition

Samagi Jana Balawegaya· Colombo· 6 February 2025 ·Oral question: Questions Under Standing Order 27(2)

Public FinanceInfrastructureLaw & Order
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, invoking Standing Order 27(2), raised concerns over prolonged container clearance delays at the Port of Colombo and the reported release of 323 containers without Customs examination. He asked the Government to provide details on daily container arrivals, inspection capacity, vessels allegedly diverted due to delays, economic losses, and proposed measures to improve clearance. He specifically sought information on whether any of the released containers were “red label” consignments, the criteria used for their release, their contents and importers, potential revenue loss, responsibility for preventing harmful imports, and whether an investigation or policy decision on such releases had been initiated.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Deputy Speaker, under Standing Order 27(2), I raise the following Question.

¶ 02 There is grave public concern that, during a period of prolonged delays in clearing containers at the Port of Colombo, 323 containers were reportedly released without Customs examination. The subject Minister, the Chairman-President, has not clarified matters. Delays in container clearance are detrimental to an export/re-export-driven economy and adversely affect multiple sectors. The Government must take urgent action. Accordingly, I ask:

¶ 03 1. Approximately how many containers arrive per day at the Port of Colombo? What is the daily inspection capacity at existing examination yards? Is it sufficient for efficient operations? If not, what changes have been identified and what steps have been taken to expedite clearance?

¶ 04 2. How many vessels reportedly turned away last month due to severe delays? Has the Government calculated the resulting loss? If so, how much? Has the Government considered the broader risks to exports/re-exports, and what solutions are proposed?

¶ 05 3. Of the 323 containers reportedly released without Customs examination, how many were “red label” (mandatory examination by Risk Management)? Did the committee appointed with Cabinet approval to ease congestion release them on specific criteria? What goods were inside? Will the list be tabled? How was it decided—without physical inspection—that there were no illegal or harmful items? Who imported them? How does the Government ensure no loss of revenue? If there was loss, how will it be recovered?

¶ 06 4. Who is responsible to ensure no harmful items entered the country via these containers? Who bears full responsibility for the release process? Can the Government confirm it was not an irregular transaction? Has any investigation commenced? If not, why? Under this process, will “red label” containers continue to be released without physical examination as a matter of policy?

¶ 07 Thank you.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Thursday, 6 February 2025 ·No. 1739271735020022 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/755

Cite as: The Hon. Sajith Premadasa - Leader of the Opposition. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 6 February 2025. No. 1739271735020022. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/755