The Hon. Sajith Premadasa - Leader of Opposition

¶ 01 Mr. Speaker, I wish to express some views regarding the situation that has arisen centering on Mr. Chaminda Kularatne.

¶ 02 When interpreting our Standing Orders, when interpreting the Constitution, and in operating all functions in this Parliament under democratic procedures, the Speaker, the Secretary-General’s Department, and the staff must act with propriety, unity, and constructive exchange of views.

¶ 03 In this situation, at first glance, the process that has been implemented appears mala fide—in bad faith. Because, based on what has been revealed today, it is very clear there is a divergence between your views and those of the Deputy Secretary-General concerned. Therefore, the process adopted cannot be mala fide; it must be bona fide—carried out sincerely and in good faith. There must also be no conflict of interest. As this proceeds, it must function independently, in accordance with the relevant orders and procedures.

¶ 04 It was clearly read out that there are other positions equal to the Deputy Secretary-General. Is it ethically correct to have an inquiry conducted by an officer junior to someone in an equivalent post? Is it proper? These concerns have arisen.

¶ 05 Therefore, I request that, for the first time in history when a dispute has arisen between the Secretariat and you, the best thing is that you take a step back. Everyone should take a step back, properly understand the gravity of this process, protect democracy, and protect the fundamental and human rights of Mr. Chaminda Kularatne, without violating existing procedures, and ensure that his rights are safeguarded through proper action. I make this proposal in good faith. Taking a step back is not a defeat or weakness. If we can re-examine this and come to common ground and a solution, that would be best.