10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. (Mrs.) Rohini Kumari Wijerathna

Samagi Jana Balawegaya· Matale· 9 July 2025 ·Oral question: Oral Questions to Prime Minister: Pension Disputes and FDI

Public FinanceEmployment
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Hon. Rohini Kumari Wijerathna questioned the Government’s handling of pension adjustments arising from the 2025 Budget salary increase, arguing that retirees from 2020 to 2024 have been left in an unresolved anomaly while those retiring after 1 January 2025 are aligned to the 2027 salary step. She noted that affected retirees had written to the Cabinet and President seeking a meeting and had protested on 2 May, but had not received a date. She asked the Prime Minister to clarify the Government’s position, particularly the apparent contradiction between the President’s categorisation of retirees before 2020 and after 2025 and the unresolved status of the 2020–2024 group.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Prime Minister, if you do not call it an ‘anomaly,’ at least accept that there is a ‘problem.’ The issue is this: under the last Budget, along with the 2025 public sector salary increase, the government decided that public servants retiring on or after 2025-01-01 would have their pensions elevated by aligning them to the 2027 step. Within that decision, those who retired between 2020 and 2024 have been pushed into the very anomaly—or problem—you refer to. If so, that problem stems from the decision in the latest Budget. I am happy pensions are being improved—whichever government does it. But the retirees have written to you all—the Cabinet and the President—asking for a meeting date. They even held a protest on the 2nd of May. They say they have not been given a date. I say the anomaly—or problem—was created by your decisions.

¶ 02 My second question: According to the President’s analysis, there are two categories of retirees: those who retired before 2020 and those after 2025, whose anomalies are said to be resolved. However, those who retired during 2020–2024 seem to have been forgotten. The President says one thing; you and the Deputy Minister of Labour seem to acknowledge there is an issue. What is this contradiction? Are there only two categories—‘before 2020’ and ‘after 2025’? If so, what happens to the 2020–2024 group?

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 ·No. 1752660241032216 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/9175

Cite as: The Hon. (Mrs.) Rohini Kumari Wijerathna. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 9 July 2025. No. 1752660241032216. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/9175