Topic
Corruption & Governance Reform
2,708 speeches · 349 speakers
Party share
By the speaker's party · counts only, no scoring. "Unattributed" = speeches not resolved to an MP.
Most active on this topic
| # | Member | Speeches |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hon. Bimal Rathnayake, M.P. JJB | 91 |
| 2 | Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney at Law, M.P. SJB | 86 |
| 3 | Hon. Mujibur Rahman, M.P. SJB | 80 |
| 4 | Hon. Ajith P. Perera, M.P. SJB | 70 |
| 5 | Hon. Chaminda Wijesiri, M.P. SJB | 68 |
| 6 | Hon. Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, M.P. JJB | 68 |
| 7 | Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna, M.P. Independent Group 17 - Jaffna | 67 |
| 8 | Hon. Sajith Premadasa, M.P. SJB | 65 |
| 9 | Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake, M.P. NDF | 64 |
| 10 | Hon. Wasantha Samarasinghe, M.P. JJB | 64 |
Speeches
2,708 on this topic- 5 June 2025 The Hon. (Dr.) Hansaka Wijemuni – Deputy Minister of Health and Mass Media AI summary The Deputy Minister responded to questions raised under Standing Order 27(2), stating that information from Northern provincial health authorities and the Ministry’s Chief Internal Auditor is still being obtained and that audit reports for the requested 15-year period will be tabled when received. He said investigations can proceed where complaints are made, including through the Bribery Commission, with the Ministry’s cooperation. He also announced steps to establish a formal Donation Unit under a Director to manage health sector donations transparently, address mismatched donations, and align donated items with hospital priorities. Questions by Private Notice: Coconut Industry and Northern Provincial Health Service (Q.27(2)) Read →
- 5 June 2025 The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna AI summary Under Standing Order 27(2), Dr. Ramanathan Archchuna questioned the Minister of Health and Mass Media about alleged financial mismanagement and corruption in Northern Province hospitals, particularly regarding Patient Welfare Societies handling public donations. He asked whether audit reports for the past 15 years could be submitted to Parliament, and if not, whether investigations would be initiated against hospital administrators for misuse of public funds. He also requested action through the Bribery Commission against administrators who failed to submit accounts or were involved in corruption, with impartial support for public complaints. Questions by Private Notice: Coconut Industry and Northern Provincial Health Service (Q.27(2)) Read →
- 5 June 2025 The Hon. Mujibur Rahman SJB AI summary Hon. Mujibur Rahman questioned why action had not been taken against two allegedly unregistered Chabad centres operating in Colombo 7 and Dehiwala, despite the Prime Minister previously acknowledging in December that they were not legal or registered. He noted that both premises continue to receive Police and STF security and asked the Minister to explain the lack of action after seven months. Oral Question: Israeli Religious and Cultural Centres Established in Sri Lanka (Q.632/2025) Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara objected that Opposition MPs had not been informed about decentralized fund allocations despite having voted to approve them. He said District Secretaries should notify all relevant MPs or raise the matter at District Coordinating Committees, and asked the Minister not to justify the omission. He argued that such funds should be administered without distinguishing between Government and Opposition MPs, citing the scheme’s origins under N. M. Perera in 1974. Adjournment Questions: Tax Revenue and Decentralized Budget Provisions Read →
- 4 June 2025 Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB AI summary Hon. Bimal Rathnayake argued that the current government has restored public trust by creating a corruption-free administration, citing anti-bribery measures at the Ministry of Industries and increased investor confidence. He said foreign direct investment had reached USD 650 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared with USD 483 million in 2023 and USD 724 million in 2024, and linked this to higher tax compliance and export income. He called for legal action over past corruption and alleged crimes, including the bond scam, cases involving the Rajapaksa administration, killings such as those of Wasim Thajudeen and Lasantha Wickrematunge, and the Easter Sunday attacks. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Sunil Handunnetti - Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development JJB AI summary Hon. Sunil Handunnetti supported the Anti-Corruption Act regulations, linking them to the Government’s stated effort to enforce the law and address past corruption. He cited the arrival of a new SriLankan Airlines Airbus as evidence of recovery after alleged mismanagement of the airline and criticised previous administrations over the Airbus deal and attempts to privatize or devalue the airline. He defended the Justice Minister and anti-corruption institutions against Opposition criticism, referred to complaints and alleged rackets involving sugar tax, onion imports, rice, minerals, expressways and public funds, and said investigations and prosecutions should proceed. He also announced plans for a transparent minerals investment process and a digital valuation app for gems and jewellery to improve public access and reduce opportunities for bribery. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Sunil Watagala, Attorney-at-Law JJB AI summary Hon. Sunil Watagala disputed allegations made against his party regarding members’ contributions, stating that any contributions are made to a public party fund. He rejected claims involving Rs. 80,000 as false and argued that references to the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act and the Code of Conduct do not align with his party’s actual practice. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. M. Nizam Kariapper, PC SJB AI summary Hon. M. Nizam Kariapper supported the Anti-Corruption Act Regulations and urged the Government to expedite the centralized electronic system for asset declarations under Section 87, to avoid reliance on physical storage of forms. He also used the debate to condemn the reported killing of Palestinian civilians waiting for humanitarian aid in Gaza on 3 June 2025, calling for Sri Lanka and others to speak against indiscriminate attacks on civilians, particularly children. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Najith Indika (Medical Practitioner) JJB AI summary Najith Indika supported the adoption of Regulations under the Anti-Corruption Act, No. 9 of 2023, placing them alongside the Proceeds of Crime Recovery law and amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure as part of the Government’s anti-corruption programme. He argued that corruption had been normalised in politics, said the current administration was pursuing cases through proper institutional and legal processes rather than political pressure, and cited recent prosecutions and past public anti-corruption efforts by NPP figures. He also referred to the NPP’s local government election results and accused sections of the Opposition of spreading false claims and failing to accept the Government’s mandate. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara discussed regulations under the Anti-Corruption Act, arguing that while anti-corruption enforcement is necessary, allegations involving the current Government also require investigation. He cited the release of 323 containers, rice procurement, renewable energy purchases, and salary or allowance transfers to party accounts, questioning whether similar conduct is being treated consistently under anti-corruption and parliamentary conduct rules. He also criticised what he described as inaccurate public claims by Government figures and warned against statements that could imply political influence over the judiciary. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Harshana Rajakaruna SJB AI summary Hon. Harshana Rajakaruna stated that corruption was a major cause of Sri Lanka’s bankruptcy and said the Opposition would support genuine anti-corruption measures. He cautioned the Minister of Justice against commenting on court proceedings or implying government influence over judicial outcomes, arguing that such remarks undermine institutional confidence. He urged the Government to focus on expediting long-delayed court cases through procedural and legal reforms, strengthening independent institutions, and refiling or pursuing past corruption cases, including major projects from the Rajapaksa era, without political vendettas. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Ruwan Wijeweera JJB AI summary Hon. Ruwan Wijeweera supported the Regulations under the Anti-Corruption Act, arguing that corruption by political leaders and public officials has been a central cause of Sri Lanka’s economic decline and loss of public trust. He cited definitions and indices on corruption, and referred to major infrastructure projects such as the Lotus Tower, Mattala Airport and Hambantota Port as examples of spending decisions allegedly shaped by commissions and political gain. He said the current Government was acting to address the legacy of corruption while also assisting poor communities through programmes such as housing support. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. G.G. Ponnambalam ACTC AI summary Hon. G.G. Ponnambalam called for any agreement underlying the project in question to be released publicly, arguing that the Government’s decision to proceed despite apparent unsustainability required scrutiny of its motives. He framed the issue in the context of Sri Lanka’s strategic position and geopolitical competition, urging the Government to set a precedent against foreign pressure or influence by taking action on such agreements. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. G.G. Ponnambalam ACTC AI summary Hon. G.G. Ponnambalam stated that Tamil people stand with Palestinians against genocide while distinguishing opposition to the Israeli Government’s actions from hostility to Jewish people. Speaking on Regulations under the Anti-Corruption Act, he argued that unsustainable State projects causing loss of national control constitute serious corruption and should be investigated, citing the Hambantota Harbour Project and its 99-year lease as a key example. He questioned what action the Government has taken on projects the JVP had previously described as sellouts, and urged the release of the Hambantota lease agreement, in consultation with the counterpart, for public scrutiny. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Fasmin Sharif JJB AI summary Hon. Fasmin Sharif alleged that post-1978 Opposition politicians were linked to corruption and cited recent convictions in the carrom board case as evidence that the current Government will pursue accountability and not permit wrongdoing by anyone, including its own supporters. He called for justice for victims of communal violence in Kandy, Digana and Aluthgama, including a commission to investigate racist propaganda, and stated the Government supports Palestinians while rejecting terrorism. He also raised local governance issues in Gampola, urging that revenues from the Ambuluwawa area be brought under Government responsibility and that action be taken against illegal construction causing drainage and flooding problems. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. D.V. Chanaka SLPP AI summary Hon. D.V. Chanaka asked the Government to confirm whether two reported MoUs on an India–Sri Lanka electricity grid interconnection and a Trincomalee energy hub are genuine, and called for their disclosure if they are valid national agreements. While supporting regulations under the Anti-Corruption Act on recovering assets linked to false declarations, he argued that anti-corruption laws must be applied equally to the Government, Opposition and the public. He demanded updates or investigations into issues including the “323 containers” allegation, the use of “Dr.” before Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara’s name, alleged rice import fraud, and delays in connecting temple solar panels to the grid. He also objected to ministerial comments suggesting courts were not independent in the past, saying such remarks undermine judicial independence. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. U.P. Abeywickrama, Attorney-at-Law JJB AI summary The remarks supported Regulations under the Anti-Corruption Act, No. 9 of 2023, describing them as part of the Government’s effort to strengthen institutions, the rule of law, and Sri Lanka’s compliance with international anti-corruption standards. Abeywickrama accused previous governments of normalizing corruption, waste, and political use of public resources, while asserting that the current administration is enabling investigations and prosecutions without political interference. He cited recent corruption-related arrests, tender manipulation cases, and clarifications on the “Containers 323” issue and a Government vehicle auction allegation to argue that Opposition claims against the Government were unfounded. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Mujibur Rahman SJB AI summary Mujibur Rahman invoked Standing Order 86 to clarify remarks he said had been misunderstood. He stated that in the school-related matter the mother had made several complaints but the police had not acted effectively, and added that Duminda Hulugalle had admitted on “Derana 360°” that the Sathosa tender came to him. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Wasantha Samarasinghe JJB AI summary Wasantha Samarasinghe denied Mujibur Rahman’s allegation that a Sathosa system audit tender had been awarded to a company linked to Presidential Advisor Duminda Hulugalle. He challenged Rahman to prove the claim, stating he would resign his ministerial post if it were true, and asked whether Rahman would resign his parliamentary seat if it were false. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →
- 4 June 2025 The Hon. Mujibur Rahman SJB AI summary Hon. Mujibur Rahman supported an independent CIABOC under the Anti-Corruption Act regulations, while rejecting claims that anti-corruption action began only under the current Government and arguing that those who enabled past wrongdoers should also accept responsibility. He cited recent complaints against the current administration, including the 323 containers issue, the Mannar wind power project, a Presidential Secretariat vehicle auction, the STC salt matter, and a Sathosa audit tender, and questioned whether the law is being enforced equally. He emphasized the Auditor General’s role in supporting corruption investigations and challenged the President’s attempted appointment of an external nominee as Auditor General, urging that a qualified internal officer be appointed instead and warning against any effort to influence future audits. Debate: Anti-Corruption Act Regulations Read →