Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney at Law, M.P.
Profession: Attorney-at-Law
Speeches 116 #42 of 225·#2 in party
Attendance 4/8 days present (of recorded)
Top topic Public Finance 38 speeches
Last spoke 9 June 2026 in Debate
Activity by sitting
59 sittings · counts only, no scoring.
Topic focus
AI summary AI-assigned tags, 1–3 per speech. Counts only — not a score.
Speech history
116 speeches- 28 February 2025 AI summary The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa urged the Government to treat national security as a serious and non-partisan matter, criticizing time being spent on rhetoric rather than action. He said the issue was not isolated and called for a holistic programme linking national security with inclusive development and sustainability. Appropriation Bill 2025 - Committee Stage Debate Continued (Afternoon) Security & Defence Read →
- 28 February 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa argued that national security must be treated as inseparable from sustainable development, economic stability, energy security and institutional coordination, rather than as isolated incidents or partisan issues. He cited pre-Easter attack incidents, current armed gang activity, drug trafficking routes, and tensions between security institutions as examples of warning signs that require intelligence-led, coordinated responses. He urged the Government to address emerging threats over the next five years, including extremism, organized crime linked to narcotics and maritime trafficking, cyber security risks, and public unrest, and asked the responsible Minister to inform Parliament of the Government’s plans. Appropriation Bill 2025 - Committee Stage Debate Continued (Afternoon) Law & OrderPublic FinanceSecurity & Defence Read →
- 19 February 2025 AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa criticized the Budget as relying on pre-Budget tax increases while adopting policies similar to those previously opposed by the Government, and questioned whether revenue targets under the IMF programme are realistic. He welcomed digitalization initiatives such as the Unique Digital Identity, but urged the Government to operationalize the Data Protection Authority and raised concerns about taxes on digital services, ICT exports, and creator-economy earnings. He questioned the affordability of vehicle imports under current taxes, the viability of a development bank without collateral-lending reforms, the removal of SVAT for exporters, and the Government’s approach to FDI and investor relations. He also contrasted current education allocations with earlier pledges and raised concerns about transport spending priorities. Debate: Appropriation Bill, 2025 – Second Reading Public FinanceEmploymentCost of Living Read →
- 17 February 2025 AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa requested an early response to his letter seeking a Special Committee to investigate USAID and NGO transactions, arguing that Parliament and the public should know about such activities. He opposed any postponement of the Local Authority Elections, while urging the Government and Election Commission to ensure campaigning does not disrupt the O/L examinations affecting around 400,000 to 450,000 students. He alleged recent intimidation of media, activists, protesters and political opponents, including arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act and incidents in Matale, Akuressa and Agunukolapelessa, and called on the Government to ensure a free, peaceful election without repression. Local Authorities Elections (Special Provisions) Bill: Second Reading EducationCorruption & Governance ReformJustice & Human Rights Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly stated that the Government’s policy appeared to be to follow another party’s policy. The intervention was a short remark made in response to the ongoing debate. Debate: Regulations on Imports and Exports (Control) Act and Foreign Exchange Act Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa asked the Government to state its position on an issue he distinguished from a separate inquiry and three-month suspension in another context. He sought a direct clarification of the Government’s stance rather than discussion of the external case. Debate: Regulations on Imports and Exports (Control) Act and Foreign Exchange Act Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa questioned several Government positions, arguing that policy announcements on tourism regulations, paddy pricing, vehicle imports, unemployment, and coconut shortages lacked consistency or timely implementation. He criticized the delayed paddy price decision, saying many farmers had already sold part of the Maha harvest below the announced Rs. 120 price, and asked whether campaign promises on cheaper vehicles would be honoured. He demanded that the Government disclose details of the reported release of 323 containers, clarify statements on Provincial Council Elections, and state its position on USAID-funded programmes in Sri Lanka. Debate: Regulations on Imports and Exports (Control) Act and Foreign Exchange Act EmploymentAgriculturePublic Finance Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly responded after his name was mentioned, acknowledging Hon. Nihal Galappaththi as a senior MP from his area whom he respects. He declined to engage further, adding only a figurative remark that “pots can be broken only because they are empty.” Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly rose on a point of order or clarification, stating that his name had been mentioned by another Member. No substantive policy issue, proposal, or legislative matter was raised in the excerpt. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa said that, regardless of which party is in government, Sri Lanka’s state institutions must be protected, including the Tri-Forces, Police, Police Commission and Independent Commissions. He urged the Prime Minister to issue clear guidelines, terms of reference and regulations to state institutions for the “Clean Sri Lanka” programme, and to evaluate whether its objectives are being met. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Corruption & Governance ReformLaw & Order Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa criticized the implementation of the “Clean Sri Lanka” initiative, arguing that it lacks clear objectives, guidelines and a formal TOR for officials and Members. He urged the Government to model it on structured international programmes such as “Clean India,” “America the Beautiful” and “Clean and Green Singapore,” beginning with Parliamentarians and extending through schools, universities and vocational institutes. He also warned against using the programme for political purposes, including the intimidation or suppression of the Opposition. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Corruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa urged the Minister in charge of Police to address governance and law enforcement issues substantively rather than limiting them to election rhetoric, referencing the Minister’s past role in anti-corruption investigations under the good governance Government. He said the Opposition had a responsibility to question the Government on public concerns and denied making personal accusations, while criticizing what he described as anger and hostility in response to scrutiny. He also referred to the Government’s “Clean Sri Lanka” initiative, arguing that it should begin with changes in political conduct and attitudes. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary ProcedureCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa stated that the point at issue was not his own claim, but a statement made by the President. The intervention appears to respond to an exchange in the House by attributing responsibility for the remark to the President. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa cautioned against politicized criticism of the Police Commission, state officials, and the military. He argued that security-related concerns should be raised through the Security Council rather than at political rallies, warning against public statements that could undermine state institutions. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Security & DefenceJustice & Human RightsLaw & Order Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa argued that when Opposition Members raise public concerns in Parliament, they should be heard without interruption or politicization. He referred to issues involving the Sri Lanka Police and cautioned against turning parliamentary proceedings into a forum for political revenge, contrasting this with what he characterized as the conduct of an anti-corruption commission. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Corruption & Governance ReformLaw & OrderParliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly interjected to state that the matter being referred to was from the Police, addressing the Leader of the House. No substantive argument, proposal, or policy position was developed in the excerpt provided. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Law & Order Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa questioned the Minister on whether the relevant items could be registered and challenged any implication that registration would prevent accidents. He also criticized the conduct of the Government side, referring to the Prime Minister’s remarks about the Opposition and alleging similar behaviour within Government group meetings. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa noted that further argument with the Minister was unnecessary and directed the issue to the Police, pointing out that the Minister responsible for the Police was present in the House. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Namal Rajapaksa asked for a direct clarification on whether the law now prohibits fixing parts that are otherwise permitted. He requested a brief yes-or-no answer. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa briefly intervened to direct a specific question or request to another participant in the debate. The remark contains no substantive policy argument, legislative proposal, or detailed issue beyond indicating that he was asking the matter specifically. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme Parliamentary Procedure Read →