Hon. Ajith P. Perera, M.P.
Profession: Attorney-at-Law
Speeches 320 #13 of 225·#5 in party
Attendance 8/8 days present (of recorded)
Top topic Parliamentary Procedure 157 speeches
Last spoke 9 June 2026 in Debate
Activity by sitting
92 sittings · counts only, no scoring.
Topic focus
AI summary AI-assigned tags, 1–3 per speech. Counts only — not a score.
Speech history
320 speeches- 6 February 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera said the Samagi Jana Balawegaya supports the new regulations under the IP Act as measures connected to upholding the rule of law. He recalled the 2009 assassination of journalist Lasantha Wickrematunge and related attacks, stating that investigations under the 2015 Yahapalana Government, led by senior CID officers, uncovered evidence allegedly linking members of an unofficial State-backed armed group and police officers to the crimes and to the suppression of evidence. He argued that sufficient evidence had emerged to prosecute serious offences, including destruction or disappearance of evidence connected to a homicide and links to the abduction and intimidation of Wickrematunge’s driver. Debate: Intellectual Property Act Regulations (Geographical Indications) Corruption & Governance ReformJustice & Human RightsLaw & Order Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera raised a brief point of order or query, questioning the proceedings taking place in the Chamber. No specific policy issue, proposal, or legislative matter was elaborated. Adjournment Debate: Monaragala Health Sector Issues Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera raised points of order seeking immediate consideration of Privilege Questions submitted before 9.15 a.m. regarding the composition of parliamentary committees and alleged inadequate Opposition representation. He argued that, under Standing Order 29(2), such questions submitted in time should be given priority and that the Speaker should first allow them to be raised before determining whether they constitute privilege matters. He cited past committee composition ratios and examples of accommodating Opposition members, including in COPE, to support his claim that the current 9:4 ratio is unfair and should be resolved before scheduled committee proceedings continue. Procedural: Privilege Questions and Sitting Time Motion Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera questioned the adequacy of the stakeholder consultation process for proposed reforms to the 2024 electricity-related Act, noting concerns about its principles, economic and national security implications, and limits on consumer protection under the Public Utilities Commission. He asked the Minister whether sufficient time and a formal process would be provided for MPs, engineering and electricity-sector experts, and other stakeholders to submit views, given that invitations and public notice had so far been limited. Oral Question: Sri Lanka Electricity Act Amendments (Q.293/2024) Public FinanceParliamentary ProcedureInfrastructure Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera questioned the Government’s decision not to repeal the Sri Lanka Electricity Act, No. 36 of 2024, noting that the NPP’s 2024 energy policy had promised new electricity legislation with stakeholder consultation. He argued that the current Act lacks an adequate governance structure, including a holding company to oversee unbundled CEB entities, finances, policy, and subsidiaries such as LECO and LTL Holdings. He asked why the Government was proceeding with limited amendments rather than fulfilling its mandate to introduce a new Act based on expert input. Oral Question: Sri Lanka Electricity Act Amendments (Q.293/2024) InfrastructurePublic FinanceCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 5 February 2025 AI summary Asked whether the Government intends to repeal the Sri Lanka Electricity Act, No. 36 of 2024, or alternatively introduce amendments to it. He requested details of any proposed amendments and, if no repeal or amendments are planned, the reasons for that decision. Oral Question: Sri Lanka Electricity Act Amendments (Q.293/2024) Public Finance Read →
- 22 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera questioned the legal scope and implementation of the Clean Sri Lanka programme, arguing that the Gazette establishing the Task Force frames it primarily as an environmental initiative and does not include anti-corruption, rule of law, or public sector efficiency objectives. He asked the Government to clarify the programme’s timeline, organizational structure, expert involvement, and legal authority, noting that these had not been publicly set out. He also raised concerns about financing, stating that any collection of funds must comply with Financial Regulations and be supported by a properly established institution and fund. Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme (Postponed from 2025-01-21) EnvironmentCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera asked whether the Minister would engage Sri Lanka Cricket to secure funding and support to upgrade the sports complex for first-class cricket. He noted that the eastern boundary is too short and that Sri Lanka Cricket had previously agreed to fund adjustments, including shifting the indoor facility, given the venue’s strategic location near Colombo. Oral Questions (Multiple Questions) Infrastructure Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera thanked the Minister for inspecting the venue following his question, but outlined continuing defects at the sports complex, including damage to the 400-metre track, blocked drainage, poor pool maintenance, absence of changing rooms, lack of storage for provincial sports equipment, inter-agency coordination problems, and failing rainwater systems at the indoor stadium. He asked whether the Government would allocate funds to rectify these shortcomings and ensure cooperation between the Department of Sports Development and provincial officials. Oral Questions (Multiple Questions) InfrastructurePublic Finance Read →
- 21 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera asked the Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports for details on the Kalutara District Sports Complex in Bandaragama, including its opening date, construction cost, and the current deterioration attributed to poor maintenance. He sought information on steps to upgrade the 400-metre running track and to develop adjoining land outside the security wall for vehicle parking. He also asked about an agreement between the Sports Development Department and Sri Lanka Cricket, and why proposed development of the ground for first-class cricket had not been implemented. Oral Questions (Multiple Questions) Infrastructure Read →
- 10 January 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera offered condolences on behalf of the SJB and the people of Kalutara for former MP Kumara Welgama, recalling his long public service, cross-party political relationships, popularity in Kalutara, and his conduct after being assaulted during the Aragalaya period. He also conveyed sympathy to Welgama’s family and expressed hope that his son Senal Welgama would continue in public life. Perera further paid tribute to former MPs Tudor Gunasekara and H. Nandaseena, highlighting Gunasekara’s UNP legacy in Gampaha and extending condolences to Nandaseena’s family. Votes of Condolence: Hon. Kumara Welgama, Hon. H. Nandasena, and Hon. Tudor Gunasekera Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 7 January 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera informed the House that he would not raise a scheduled question concerning two three-storeyed school buildings in Bandaragama—at Waivita Maithri MMV and Kindelpitiya Sri Saralankara MMV. He noted that both buildings were about 90 percent complete, with only final-stage work remaining at relatively low cost, and indicated he was withdrawing the question to save parliamentary time. Oral Question: Bandaragama Central Secondary School Development (Continuation of earlier question) Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 7 January 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera requested priority funding to complete the remaining work under the “Nearest School is the Best School” project at K/Ramukkana Vidyaloka Primary School in Bandaragama, noting the shortage of advanced secondary schools in the area. He said the primary section and part of the secondary building have been completed under an existing master plan, while the halted secondary section requires about Rs. 300 million, and asked whether the Government would complete it in the coming year as a model fully fledged school. Oral Question: Bandaragama Central Secondary School Development (Continuation of earlier question) InfrastructureEducationPublic Finance Read →
- 18 December 2024 AI summary Ajith P. Perera requested an additional two minutes to speak, stating that a Minister had used part of his allotted time. Debate: Supplementary Estimate – Head 102, Programme 01 (School Supplies Grant) Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 18 December 2024 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera briefly objected, stating that the situation or ruling under discussion was unfair. No specific proposal, question, or further context was provided in the remark. Debate: Supplementary Estimate – Head 102, Programme 01 (School Supplies Grant) Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 18 December 2024 AI summary Ajith P. Perera criticized another member’s claimed doctoral qualifications, stating that available records contradict those claims. He called for the matter to be acknowledged in Parliament. Debate: Supplementary Estimate – Head 102, Programme 01 (School Supplies Grant) Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 18 December 2024 AI summary Ajith P. Perera stated that on 25 January 2024 Mr. Nanayakkara presented himself to voters as an attorney and claimed that his legal qualification was from England rather than Sri Lanka. The point raised concerns the accuracy or representation of Mr. Nanayakkara’s professional credentials in a political context. Debate: Supplementary Estimate – Head 102, Programme 01 (School Supplies Grant) Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 18 December 2024 AI summary Ajith P. Perera referred to Act No. 26 of 2023, stating that Section 4 distinguishes between an Instructing Attorney and Counsel and asserting that he is a Counsel. He also tabled a social media post dated 06.03.2020 in which the Minister had identified himself as an attorney while seeking votes, challenging the Minister’s understanding of the distinction. Debate: Supplementary Estimate – Head 102, Programme 01 (School Supplies Grant) Law & Order Read →
- 18 December 2024 AI summary Ajith P. Perera argued that the proposed Rs. 6,000 school supplies allowance should not be limited to children in Aswesuma beneficiary families because the Aswesuma selection process is flawed and discretionary, and proposed instead that it be granted universally to all schoolchildren. He also questioned the lack of detailed disclosure on the President’s visit to India, particularly regarding physical, digital, and energy connectivity proposals, and sought clarification on the proposed multi-product energy pipeline, its financing, conditions, and the role of the UAE. He further stated that the Government appeared to be continuing the previous administration’s policy direction and, in response to a personal matter raised by the Minister of Justice, clarified his professional status as Counsel under Act No. 26 of 2023 while tabling related campaign material. Debate: Supplementary Estimate – Head 102, Programme 01 (School Supplies Grant) Foreign AffairsPublic FinanceCost of Living Read →
- 3 December 2024 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera argued that Sectoral Oversight Committees are an important mechanism for backbench Members to contribute to policymaking and should not be abolished or curtailed. He also raised a procedural concern that renaming them as “Ministry Advisory Committees” would conflict with the existing Standing Orders, where such committees are separately defined. Procedural: Points of Order and Standing Orders Clarifications (Vote on Account, Ministry Advisory Committees, Party Leaders' Agreement) Parliamentary Procedure Read →