Hon. Ajith P. Perera, M.P.
Profession: Attorney-at-Law
Speeches 320 #13 of 225·#5 in party
Attendance 8/8 days present (of recorded)
Top topic Parliamentary Procedure 157 speeches
Last spoke 9 June 2026 in Debate
Activity by sitting
92 sittings · counts only, no scoring.
Topic focus
AI summary AI-assigned tags, 1–3 per speech. Counts only — not a score.
Speech history
320 speeches- 20 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera moved the customary Rs. 10 reduction under Head 119 and criticized changes in Minister Nalinda Jayatissa’s stance on media-related issues after assuming office. Turning to the electricity sector, he said the Opposition supports Ceylon Electricity Board restructuring into more manageable functions to improve service and pricing, but argued that future reforms must allow domestic and foreign investment if Sri Lanka is to develop a smart grid requiring an estimated USD 8–10 billion. He urged the Government to engage an experienced professional restructuring firm, such as PwC or another comparable firm, to manage the transition rather than relying only on limited internal arrangements. Committee Stage: Appropriation Bill 2026 - Head 119 (Ministry of Energy) Cut Motion and Debate InfrastructurePublic Finance Read →
- 19 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera questioned the Minister of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development on alleged irregularities involving Asha Minerals, including a 30-year agreement with the Sri Lanka Cement Corporation at Aruwakkalu, alleged mining without a valid licence, and a police raid. He also asked about a salvage contract with Lanka Mineral Sands Ltd., possession of ilmenite cargo reportedly worth Rs. 300 million despite Attorney-General objections, and alleged diversion of mineral assets. He sought details on measures to protect State resources, ensure accountability, and restore the rights of legitimate licence holders. Written Answers to Questions and Administrative Notices Justice & Human RightsEnvironmentPublic Finance Read →
- 17 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera raised concerns about the composition of Supreme Court Benches hearing leave to proceed in fundamental rights applications and asked the Government to examine whether any pattern was affecting access to fundamental rights litigation. He urged the Minister of Justice to expand capacity, staffing, technology, and management at the Government Analyst’s Department, citing a backlog of about 30,000 samples and delays affecting criminal proceedings and detainees. He also called for urgent amendment of Section 9(a) of the Civil Procedure Code, saying its current form has concentrated money recovery and other cases in the Colombo District Court and enabled forum-related harassment. He further noted concern over unimplemented policy and law reform commitments, particularly constitutional reform and abolition of the Executive Presidency. Debate - Appropriation Bill 2026 Committee Stage Continuation (Foreign Affairs, Justice and National Integration) Justice & Human RightsLaw & OrderPublic Finance Read →
- 17 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera supported concerns about the poor condition of the Matugama court complex and urged the Government to prioritize relocating the Magistrate’s and District Courts to available government land. He raised concerns over High Court judicial promotions, stating that around 35 District Court Judges had been superseded and calling for transparent, criteria-based selection procedures rather than subjective decision-making. He also expressed concern that many fundamental rights applications were being dismissed by the Supreme Court at the leave-to-proceed stage, emphasizing the Court’s role as the sole forum for protecting such rights. Debate - Appropriation Bill 2026 Committee Stage Continuation (Foreign Affairs, Justice and National Integration) Justice & Human RightsLaw & Order Read →
- 17 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera argued that the existence of a court “B Report” does not, under past Speakers’ rulings, automatically prevent Parliament from debating a matter on sub judice grounds. He objected to limiting the debate on that basis and added that such issues arise in the context of alleged anti-Buddhist sentiment. Debate - Appropriation Bill 2026 Committee Stage Continuation (Foreign Affairs, Justice and National Integration) Parliamentary ProcedureReligion & Culture Read →
- 17 November 2025 AI summary No substantive speech content is provided beyond the opening address to the Chair. Therefore, no policy argument, proposal, question, or demand can be identified from the excerpt. Debate - Appropriation Bill 2026 Committee Stage Continuation (Foreign Affairs, Justice and National Integration) Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 15 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera argued that constitutionally independent institutions have weakened over the past decade due to insufficient administrative oversight. He called on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and Parliament to carry out the necessary review. Debate: Committee Stage - Appropriation Bill 2026, Special Spending Units (Heads 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 16-25) Parliamentary ProcedureCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 15 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera argued that Parliament should protect the independence of Independent Commissions and exercise its oversight powers under Standing Orders 126(1)-(3) rather than relying on public criticism of their performance. He focused on the Ombudsman established under Article 156 of the Constitution, stating that low public use, delays, and non-compliance with recommendations have weakened the office, and called for public awareness, adequate facilities, and stronger effect for its determinations. He also began to raise concerns regarding the Human Rights Commission, noting its statutory independence and the current role of the Supreme Court in fundamental rights jurisdiction. Debate: Committee Stage - Appropriation Bill 2026, Special Spending Units (Heads 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 16-25) Parliamentary ProcedureJustice & Human RightsCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 15 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera argued that Parliament has underperformed in its core lawmaking role, noting that none of the 11 Bills proposed in the previous Budget had been passed and urging a renewed focus on legislation and constitutional reform with expert support. He defended the role of Independent Commissions as safeguards against excessive executive power while acknowledging that they must operate within constitutional and statutory limits. He called on the Committee on Parliamentary Business, under Standing Order 126, to examine the annual reports of Article 41B Commissions, assess their performance and legality, summon officials where necessary, and inform the public if reports have not been submitted. Debate: Committee Stage - Appropriation Bill 2026, Special Spending Units (Heads 1, 2, 4-11, 13, 16-25) Corruption & Governance ReformParliamentary ProcedureJustice & Human Rights Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera challenged a claim made in the debate by asking where such an allegation had been made. The intervention appears to seek clarification or evidence for a referenced accusation. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera denied an allegation concerning the Opposition Leader’s sister, stating that she had been defrauded, that the offender was prosecuted in the High Court, imprisoned, and ordered to pay her compensation as the victim. He criticised Government-side Deputy Ministers for making what he described as false and improper statements in Parliament. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Justice & Human RightsCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera rose on a point of order. No substantive issue or argument was stated in the provided excerpt. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera criticized the Minister for not answering a question about a new Constitution. He alleged that the Government intended to continue with the existing amended Constitution due to an attachment to executive power. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Corruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera argued that Government policy on pursuing serious legal cases should not depend passively on the Attorney-General, and called for the AG to be directed to identify such cases and seek the Chief Justice’s approval. He stated that applications and approvals are not currently being pursued, and asked the Government to clarify the status of its promise to introduce a new Constitution. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Justice & Human RightsCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera referred to the special Permanent High Court-at-Bar, indicating relevance to its role or proceedings. No further substantive argument, proposal, or question is contained in the provided extract. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 12 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera criticized the Government for failing to enact the legislative programme announced in the 2025 Budget, stating that none of the 11 promised economic and regulatory Bills had been passed and that Parliament’s legislative output had fallen compared with recent years. He questioned the adequacy of funding for CIABOC and the absence of corruption cases referred to the Permanent High Court-at-Bar, arguing that anti-corruption commitments were not being matched by action. He also urged the Government to proceed with its manifesto commitment to introduce a new Constitution abolishing the Executive Presidency and establishing a parliamentary system, noting that the Budget speech was silent on this issue. Appropriation Bill, 2026 - Second Reading Debate Justice & Human RightsPublic FinanceCorruption & Governance Reform Read →
- 8 November 2025 AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera asked the Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports whether there is a plan to maintain and renovate the Kalutara District Sports Complex in Bandaragama, including details of proposed works, estimated costs, and expenditure in 2025. He also sought information on whether the Ministry is aware of damage to the track and turf, and what steps will be taken to repair the surface and prevent rainwater accumulation in the stadium. Oral Question: Kalutara District Sports Complex - Maintenance Infrastructure Read →
- 24 October 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera conveyed condolences to the families of seven former Members of Parliament and paid particular tribute to Heenmahatmaya Liyanage, Dr. Merwyn D. de Silva, Y.G. Padmasiri, and R.M.R. Chula Bandara. He highlighted Liyanage’s service as a teacher, Deputy Minister, and representative of Ratnapura; Dr. de Silva’s contribution as a National List MP and public intellectual; Padmasiri’s long involvement in left politics and provincial representation; and Chula Bandara’s legal, parliamentary, and diplomatic service. He also referred to personal associations with some of them and extended sympathy to their families, including current MP Waruna Liyanage and Padmasiri’s daughter Vathsala Janadari. Votes of Condolence: Seven Former Members of Parliament Parliamentary Procedure Read →
- 23 October 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera asked the Minister of Health and Mass Media to provide annual allocations since 2016 for implementing rights under the Right to Information Act, No. 12 of 2016. He also sought details on future measures and legal reforms to strengthen the Act, and requested annual figures from 2017 onward on appeals received, resolved, and still pending before the Right to Information Commission. Written Answer: Allocation for Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Q.1461/2025) Corruption & Governance ReformJustice & Human Rights Read →
- 23 October 2025 AI summary Ajith P. Perera asked the Minister of Energy for details on voluntary retirement applications by Ceylon Electricity Board employees under the CEB restructuring process pursuant to the Sri Lanka Electricity Act, No. 36 of 2024, as amended by Act No. 14 of 2025. He requested a post-wise breakdown of applicants, reasons where voluntary retirement has not been sought, the compensation allocation for retiring employees, and the proposed funding sources for that compensation. Written Answer: Restructure of Ceylon Electricity Board (Q.1460/2025) EmploymentPublic Finance Read →