10th Parliament· 154 sittings on record · 30,475 speeches · latest 10 June 2026

The Hon. Rajeevan Jeyachandramoorthy

Jathika Jana balawegaya· Jaffna· 20 June 2025 ·Adjournment: Adjournment Motion: District Coordinating Committees - Effectiveness, Accountability and Legal Clarity of Decisions

Public FinanceCorruption & Governance ReformParliamentary Procedure
AI summary generated by gpt-5.5

Hon. Rajeevan Jeyachandramoorthy moved an Adjournment Motion raising concerns about the effectiveness, accountability and legal clarity of District Coordinating Committee decisions. He said DCC resolutions are often not monitored, inadequately implemented or disregarded, and that uncertainty over their legal authority weakens accountability among State agencies. He proposed a national monitoring framework with periodic reports to Parliament, a review and possible amendment of the legal framework, oversight by the District Secretary or an independent body, and quarterly implementation reports for MPs.

Verbatim record (translated)

Machine-translated from Sinhala / Tamil / English

¶ 01 Hon. Presiding Member, I move the following Adjournment Motion:

¶ 02 “I rise today to draw the attention of this House to a matter of significant concern regarding the effectiveness, accountability and legal clarity surrounding the decisions made by District Coordinating Committees (DCCs).

¶ 03 These committees serve as crucial forums where Members of Parliament, Provincial Governors and heads of relevant State institutions convene to deliberate on and decide matters critical to district-level development. Despite the importance of these committees, I have observed and received consistent complaints regarding several shortcomings that hinder their intended impact.

¶ 04 The key issues are as follows: 1. Lack of a Monitoring Mechanism There is currently no formal or standardized system in place to monitor or evaluate implementation of DCC decisions.

¶ 05 2. Failure of Implementation Many decisions taken during DCC meetings are either inadequately implemented or, in some instances, entirely disregarded by relevant institutions, thereby undermining the very purpose of the committees.

¶ 06 3. Legal Ambiguity There is ongoing concern among stakeholders about the legal authority of DCC decisions. This ambiguity limits accountability and the responsiveness of State agencies.

¶ 07 4. Stakeholder Complaints I have received numerous complaints from public officials, local authorities and members of civil society regarding the lack of enforcement of DCC resolutions.

¶ 08 In light of these issues, I respectfully propose that this House consider the following recommendations: - Establish a National Monitoring Framework to systematically track the implementation of DCC decisions, with progress reports submitted periodically to Parliament. - Review the Legal Framework governing DCCs, and where necessary, introduce legislative amendments to clarify and strengthen the binding nature of DCC decisions. - Assign responsibility for oversight to the District Secretary or an independent oversight body, to ensure regular reporting and follow-up at the district level. - Empower Members of Parliament to request and receive quarterly reports on the implementation status of DCC decisions within their constituencies.

¶ 09 These steps are essential to enhance the operational effectiveness of DCCs and to ensure that development decisions made at the district level are implemented in a transparent and accountable manner.”

¶ 10 Thank you.

Provenance

Source
Hansard, Friday, 20 June 2025 ·No. 1751600792021434 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Page · column
not yet extracted — page/column anchors are not in the current dataset; the source PDF is the citable location.
Permalink
/lk/speeches/1993

Cite as: The Hon. Rajeevan Jeyachandramoorthy. 10th Parliament, Parliament of Sri Lanka. Hansard, 20 June 2025. No. 1751600792021434. Politick, https://staging.politick.io/lk/speeches/1993