Topic
Law & Order
1,620 speeches · 292 speakers
Party share
By the speaker's party · counts only, no scoring. "Unattributed" = speeches not resolved to an MP.
Most active on this topic
| # | Member | Speeches |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hon. Ananda Wijepala, M.P. JJB | 137 |
| 2 | Hon. Sajith Premadasa, M.P. SJB | 57 |
| 3 | Hon. Bimal Rathnayake, M.P. JJB | 55 |
| 4 | Hon. Sunil Watagala, Attorney at Law, M.P. JJB | 46 |
| 5 | Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney at Law, M.P. SJB | 45 |
| 6 | Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney at Law, M.P. JJB | 43 |
| 7 | Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna, M.P. Independent Group 17 - Jaffna | 37 |
| 8 | Hon. Mujibur Rahman, M.P. SJB | 36 |
| 9 | Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake, M.P. NDF | 32 |
| 10 | Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney at Law, M.P. SLPP | 30 |
Speeches
1,620 on this topic- 10 October 2025 The Hon. (Dr.) Najith Indika JJB AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Najith Indika argued that the National Police Commission’s delegation of powers to the IGP regarding OIC transfers is constitutionally permitted under Article 155G(1) and does not amount to a reduction of Commission powers. He said the delegation is revocable, subject to criteria and limits, and supported by the Attorney General’s clarification that SI, IP, and CI officers may serve as OICs without it constituting a promotion or demotion. He linked the need for swift operational decisions to current action against organized crime and drug networks, while rejecting allegations of political pressure on the NPC. He also criticized the Opposition for requesting the debate under Standing Order 19 as urgent while many of the Members who supported it were absent. Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2)) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB AI summary Ananda Wijepala argued that the debate concerned transfers of Officers-in-Charge in the Police, not appointments, and said such transfers are lawful when powers are delegated by the National Police Commission under the Constitution. He cited previous Gazette notifications as precedents and stated that the President or Minister does not acquire these powers, while the IGP must follow Commission-set criteria and affected officers may appeal to the Commission. He rejected claims of politicization, contrasted current procedures with alleged past political influence in OIC appointments, and said the Government is strengthening police independence, discipline, promotions, resources, and rule-of-law enforcement. Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2)) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB AI summary Hon. Ananda Wijepala rejected claims that the Government was seeking to abolish or reclaim the powers of Independent Commissions, arguing that the NPP/JVP had consistently supported their independence while others had supported earlier rollbacks. He said the Constitution, particularly Articles 155A and 155G, permits the National Police Commission to delegate specified powers to the IGP or other authorities by Gazette, while retaining overall authority and setting conditions. He cited previous Gazettes from 2011, 2016 and 2020 as precedents and tabled two of them, stating that current concerns relate to transfers of Officers-in-Charge rather than new appointments. He also alleged that past OIC appointments had been politically influenced and maintained that any present delegation must follow NPC criteria such as performance records and pending disciplinary or legal matters. Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2)) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. Ananda Wijepala - Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs JJB AI summary The Minister stated that the JVP and NPP have consistently supported Independent Commissions and their powers, framing them as important to democratic governance and institutional independence. He appears to be addressing the Government’s position on such commissions in the context of parliamentary debate, emphasizing continuity with those parties’ stated policy stance. Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2)) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. D.V. Chanaka SLPP AI summary Hon. D.V. Chanaka seconded the Motion supporting the independence of the National Police Commission, arguing that the powers granted under the 19th Amendment over police appointments, promotions, transfers, discipline, and dismissal should remain with the Commission. He requested government intervention to ensure Special Task Force officers receive fair promotion parity with other police ranks. He also cited allegations of politicized transfers and intimidation of officers, warning that shifting NPC powers to the IGP could worsen abuse and undermine police independence. Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2)) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. Arjuna Sujeewa Senasinghe, Attorney-at-Law SJB AI summary Arjuna Sujeewa Senasinghe moved an adjournment motion urging Parliament to intervene over reported plans to transfer powers over OIC transfers from the National Police Commission to the IGP by Gazette. He argued that such a move would undermine the constitutional independence of the NPC, as strengthened under the 19th and 21st Amendments, and said he had written to the Speaker as Chair of the Constitutional Council seeking urgent action. He linked the issue to concerns over politicization of investigative institutions and rising organized crime, citing figures for serious incidents and murders in 2024 and early 2025, and requested the Prime Minister to act to preserve the Commission’s independence. Adjournment: Motion on Independence of National Police Commission (SO 19(2)) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. (Mrs.) M.A.C.S. Chathuri Gangani JJB AI summary Hon. (Mrs.) M.A.C.S. Chathuri Gangani supported the proposal to strengthen legal education, arguing that citizens need practical knowledge of the law to build an ethical, disciplined, and law-abiding society. She stated that the 2026 education reforms will include Law within Civic Education from Grade 6, following earlier parliamentary discussions and requests by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka. She outlined a grade-wise module structure from “Law for Life” in Grade 6 to “Government and the Law-abiding Citizen” in Grade 11, with compulsory modules for Grades 6-9 and optional preference-based modules for Grades 10-11, aimed at addressing issues such as child protection, violence, drugs, corruption, fraud, and environmental harm. Private Members' Motion P.43/2025: Integrating Law and Ethics to School Curriculum Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. Ruwan Mapalagama JJB AI summary Hon. Ruwan Mapalagama moved a resolution urging the Government to integrate basic legal education into the Civic Education syllabus from Grades 6 to 11, arguing that citizens are expected to know the law despite the absence of structured legal instruction in schools. He proposed renaming Civic Education as “Law and Civic Education” under the 2026 Grade 6 reforms and strengthening legal modules without adding a separate new subject. He cited international examples and noted support from the Bar Association of Sri Lanka for including law in the school curriculum to promote legally aware and responsible citizens. Private Members' Motion P.43/2025: Integrating Law and Ethics to School Curriculum Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. (Dr.) Anil Jayantha JJB AI summary Dr. Anil Jayantha responded to concerns about illegal microfinance and finance schemes, noting that many operate through legal corporate registration while conducting unregulated financial activities, sometimes with political or influential backing. He said the Government, with the Central Bank and Financial Intelligence Unit, is strengthening supervision under the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing framework ahead of the March 2026 evaluation, and will use new legislation to regulate the thousands of unregistered village-level microfinance operators. He also highlighted online financial fraud and pyramid-style schemes, stressing the need for legal action and improved financial literacy to prevent people being misled by unrealistically high returns. Oral Questions and Government Answers (Questions 342/2024, 7/561/2025, 9/984/2025, 10/1120/2025, 8/625/2025) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. Sajith Premadasa - Leader of the Opposition SJB AI summary Sajith Premadasa raised concerns about illegal financial institutions, online loan schemes, and vehicle seizure groups, citing major depositor losses at the Eastern Hewagamkorala Cooperative Society and alleged harassment of borrowers through social media and workplaces. He asked the Minister what action would be taken to protect the public from illegal micro and small loan rackets, online lending operations charging excessive interest, and unlawful vehicle seizures. Oral Questions and Government Answers (Questions 342/2024, 7/561/2025, 9/984/2025, 10/1120/2025, 8/625/2025) Read →
- 10 October 2025 The Hon. (Dr.) Anil Jayantha JJB AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Anil Jayantha said some entities presenting themselves as microfinance institutions operate outside the Microfinance Act, often under the Companies Act, limiting Central Bank supervision and requiring action under general criminal law where fraud is involved. He stated that the Government is examining these regulatory gaps and intends to introduce a new Bill on the microfinance sector. Regarding Privelth Global (Pvt.) Limited, he said action to recover depositors’ money depends on evidence that deposits were accepted, and requested affected persons to submit such evidence so authorities can proceed. Oral Questions and Government Answers (Questions 342/2024, 7/561/2025, 9/984/2025, 10/1120/2025, 8/625/2025) Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna - Minister of Plantation and Community Infrastructure JJB AI summary Minister K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna defended the Government’s first year in office, contrasting it with what he described as failed promises and crises under previous administrations. He argued that predictions of economic collapse, religious restrictions, IMF disengagement, and renewed shortages had not materialized, and said the Government had rebuilt reserves, maintained economic stability, and avoided fuel, gas, and milk powder queues. He highlighted action against underworld activity, narcotics and corruption, claiming the law was being applied equally to powerful figures. He also cited increased welfare allowances and salaries, and said discussions were continuing on advancing the estate workers’ daily wage to Rs. 1,700. Adjournment Debate: Implementation of Manifesto - Continued Discussion Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. Ikbal Muawiyath AI summary Hon. Ikbal Muawiyath said fears raised during the election campaign about his government oppressing people had proved misplaced. He argued that the government’s formation was necessary to confront the spread of drugs, underworld activity and other anti-social threats, and called on all Sri Lankans to work together to protect society and build a better future. Adjournment Debate: Implementation of Manifesto - Continued Discussion Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. Muneer Mulaffer - Deputy Minister of National Integration JJB AI summary The Deputy Minister argued that past governments used fear and communalism to retain power and failed to build trust after the war, leading to economic collapse and stalled development. He said the current government is restoring domestic and international credibility, restarting delayed infrastructure, education and health projects, and taking stronger action against narcotics and organized crime. He also highlighted growth in exports, services and tourism, including the “Ruhunuring” initiative, and said further development programmes are being prepared, including in the North. Adjournment Debate: Implementation of Manifesto - Continued Discussion Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. R.M. Ranjith Madduma Bandara SJB AI summary R.M. Ranjith Madduma Bandara questioned whether the Government had fulfilled its first-year promises, particularly on public sector salaries and pensions, arguing that increases were far below commitments and that promised pension adjustments had not been made. He criticized reported moves to reduce the powers of the National Police Commission over transfers and promotions, saying this would undermine the intent of the 19th and 21st Amendments on independent commissions. He also asked what progress had been made on justice for the Easter Sunday attacks, including claims about “Sara” being in India, and challenged the Government over rising borrowing, lack of visible development projects, weak public purchasing power, and unfulfilled commitments to teachers under the Subodinee Report. Adjournment Debate: Implementation of Manifesto - Multiple Speakers Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. Gnanamuththu Srineshan ITAK AI summary Gnanamuththu Srineshan said the Government’s policy statement on a “Prosperous Country - A Beautiful Life” should be assessed by whether it has laid foundations for fair access to food, housing and clothing, while noting that long-standing communal and extremist politics since Independence have hindered such progress. He welcomed action against drugs, underworld gangs and corruption, including recent narcotics-related arrests, but argued that investigations must reach the masterminds, including those behind the Easter attacks and any “black state” networks. He also called for action against corrupt officials who remain in positions of influence and for the implementation of inquiry report recommendations without protection or delay. Adjournment Debate: Implementation of Manifesto - Government and Opposition Speeches Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. (Dr.) Harini Amarasuriya - Prime Minister and Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education JJB AI summary Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya said the Government’s first-year priorities were shaped by the need to stabilize a stalled economy, restore public and investor confidence, and begin implementing the policy framework “A Prosperous Country - A Beautiful Life.” She highlighted the peaceful conduct of three elections, the functioning of independent commissions, and the establishment or revival of bodies such as the National Commission for Women and the Sri Lanka National Commission for UNESCO as evidence of strengthened democracy. Referring to the Education Ministry, she said policy implementation is focused on reducing inequalities in schools, easing burdens on children, teachers and parents, and expanding higher education. Adjournment Motion: Implementation of Manifesto "A Thriving Nation, A Beautiful Life" - Opening Speeches Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. Ramalingam Chandrasekar - Minister of Fisheries, Aquatic and Ocean Resources JJB AI summary The Minister tabled a response detailing enforcement action under the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Act, reporting 568 cases in Northern and Eastern districts in 2024 and 362 cases up to end-August 2025 for offences including illegal gear, prohibited species, unlicensed fishing, and unauthorized Indian operations. He stated that district officers have been instructed to act on complaints despite resource constraints, that 30 prosecutions under the Foreign Fishing Boats Act have been instituted this year and 15 Indian trawlers confiscated, and that no Ministry development activity is taking place at Kurikattuwan. He also outlined the phased development of Myliddy Fisheries Harbour, said sea cucumber aquaculture sites are assessed by relevant agencies before approval, and noted recent Cabinet approvals to fill technical vacancies in the Department. Ministry Statements and Clarifications on Independent Commissions and Provincial Council Elections Read →
- 9 October 2025 Hon. (Dr.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Harini Amarasuriya stated that the Government is addressing identified issues and rejected claims that it avoids elections, noting that three elections, including previously postponed ones, were held peacefully. She also said the Central Bank’s independence is established by law enacted under the previous Government, and invited proposals to amend that law or to establish a Youth Commission for discussion. Ministry Statements and Clarifications on Independent Commissions and Provincial Council Elections Read →
- 9 October 2025 The Hon. M. A. M. Thahir ACMC AI summary Hon. M. A. M. Thahir raised a Standing Order 27(2) question on alleged inconsistencies between Sri Lanka’s marriage registration laws and related administrative circulars affecting Muslims and foreign nationals. He asked the Minister to clarify how the General Marriage Ordinance, Kandyan Marriage and Divorce Act, and Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act apply where both parties are Muslim or where one party is a foreign Muslim. He claimed these rules create a registration vacuum and reports of officials pressuring Muslims to declare themselves non-Muslim, and requested government action to resolve the inconsistency and prevent discriminatory administrative practices. Oral Question 4: Special Schools and Standing Order 27(2) Questions Read →