Sitting of Tuesday, 21 January 2025
Source: Hansard PDF (parliament.lk) ↗ ·No. 1737707091008005 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Order of business
Speeches load per item. Summaries shown here are AI-generated and labelled; verbatim text is on each speech page.
- 1 Opening Opening 1 speeches
- 2 Papers Papers Presented 5 speeches
- 3 Oral question Oral Questions (Multiple Questions) 39 speeches
- 4 Oral question Oral Questions (Multiple Questions) 12 speeches
- 5 Oral question Oral Questions (Multiple Questions) 28 speeches
- 6 Procedural Question of Privilege: Hon. Sivagnanam Shritharan (Travel Ban) 5 speeches
- 7 Procedural Procedural: Sitting Hours and Withdrawal of Resolution 2 speeches
- 8 Adjournment Adjournment Debate: Clean Sri Lanka Programme 185 speeches
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake formally moved the motion “That Parliament do now adjourn.” The Deputy Speaker then proposed the question to the House.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Asitha Niroshana Egoda Vithana JJB
AI summary Asitha Niroshana Egoda Vithana moved an Adjournment Motion calling for Parliament, the public sector, private sector, and citizens to support the Clean Sri Lanka Programme launched by the President on 1 January 2025 under the vision “A Beautiful Island – A Joyful People.” He said the programme is a key non-economic initiative within the Government’s policy agenda, intended to promote social, environmental, and ethical transformation alongside economic reforms. He argued that the Tenth Parliament has a historic responsibility, across party and community lines, to address hardship, change negative perceptions of Sri Lanka, and build a more disciplined, compassionate, and environmentally conscious society.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Asitha Niroshana Egoda Vithana JJB
AI summary Hon. Asitha Niroshana Egoda Vithana highlighted deaths and economic losses caused by human-elephant conflict, dengue, floods, landslides and other climate-related hazards, citing Sri Lanka’s ranking in the Global Climate Risk Index and annual disaster losses exceeding USD 300 million. He defended the Clean Sri Lanka programme as a response to these challenges and rejected claims that its launch cost over Rs. 7 million, stating the committed amount was about Rs. 900,000. He urged Opposition Members and the wider public, including private entities, state institutions, volunteers, expatriates and experts, to support the programme, noting that rupee and dollar accounts had been opened for contributions.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Muneer Mulaffer JJB
AI summary Hon. Muneer Mulaffer seconded the Adjournment Motion on the Clean Sri Lanka programme, arguing that it is a broad national initiative for social, environmental and moral renewal rather than a limited effort targeting vehicle decorations or particular sectors. He rejected claims that the programme is anti-people or aimed at suppressing the media, and said the Government seeks to unite all communities and justify the public trust placed in it. He called for participation beyond race, religion, language and party divisions to support the programme’s stated aim of a “prosperous country” and a “beautiful life.”
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha SJB
AI summary Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha questioned the Government’s vision, scope and funding mechanism for the Clean Sri Lanka programme, stating that officials and the public appear to lack a common understanding of its activities and objectives. He asked for a clear activity list and raised concerns about practical implementation, including waste disposal after clean-up activities and enforcement against vehicle accessories. He argued that the programme should address issues he described as political and economic “mafias,” including liquor licence allocations, trade agreements such as ETCA and the Singapore agreement, the rice market, electricity tariffs, and the pharmaceutical sector.
- The Hon. (Dr.) Nalinda Jayathissa JJB
AI summary Responding to a reference to his name, Hon. (Dr.) Nalinda Jayathissa addressed claims that a medicine formerly priced at Rs. 76,000 is now sold at Rs. 370. He suggested that further details, including the ownership of the company and the reasons for the price change, should be sought from the Member for Alawatuwala in the relevant district.
- The Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha SJB
AI summary Nalin Bandara Jayamaha urged the Government to act on alleged corruption and profiteering, citing a medicine reportedly reduced from Rs. 76,000 to Rs. 370 and the delayed tabling of the bar licence list promised within 48 hours. He said the Government, with its parliamentary majority, should stop blaming past administrations and directly address any “mafia” or wrongdoing. He also raised concerns about alleged manipulation within the Ceylon Electricity Board, particularly system-control practices and the influence of union figures, comparing it to the former diesel mafia.
- The Hon. (Dr.) Nalinda Jayathissa JJB
AI summary Dr. Nalinda Jayathissa stated that the electricity tariff has already been reduced.
Cost of Living Full speech → - The Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha SJB
AI summary Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha questioned the Government’s “Clean Sri Lanka” programme, arguing that its definition, scope, vision, mission, and funding have not been clearly presented to Parliament or the public. He asked whether the programme includes locality-specific plans, upgrading estate line rooms and poor urban housing, and ensuring timely fertilizer supply to farmers. He also sought details of any agreements from discussions with India and China on an oil refinery, including whether benefits would accrue to Sri Lankans or mainly to exports, and called for such agreements to be shown to Parliament if public support is expected.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law – Minister of Justice and National Integration JJB
AI summary Minister Harshana Nanayakkara said the Clean Sri Lanka programme is intended as a long-term national effort, not merely an environmental campaign, and that the Government is conducting a month-long awareness programme through the Presidential Task Force to change public attitudes and practices. He argued that the new Government, in office for only two months, has begun by reducing waste and political privilege, allowing public institutions to function without interference, and implementing measures such as fertilizer assistance, fisheries fuel relief, and electricity tariff reductions based on PUCSL recommendations. He also referred to alleged political corruption involving payments for parliamentary seats and said such matters should be investigated if complainants come forward, presenting anti-bribery and institutional integrity as part of the Clean Sri Lanka agenda.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Gnanamuththu Srineshan ITAK
AI summary Hon. Gnanamuththu Srineshan expressed support for the Clean Sri Lanka initiative, provided it is implemented practically to address not only environmental cleanliness but also corruption, crime, communalism, discriminatory laws, and divisive politics. He called for guaranteed prices for farmers, flood relief and repairs to damaged infrastructure in the North and East, including the Kiran Bridge and the Vakarai–Kattumurippu and Mandur–Moongilaru roads. He also requested action for depositors affected by The Finance Company closure, employment opportunities for Bachelor of Education graduates, and permanent appointments for field mosquito eradication assistants.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Ravindra Bandara
AI summary Ravindra Bandara defended the Government’s Clean Sri Lanka programme, arguing that it should address conduct within Parliament as well as public sanitation, school facilities, transport behaviour, tourism needs, and social attitudes. He said the Government had implemented the PUCSL electricity tariff decision, was building 4,000 estate houses, would not issue bar permits through ministers, and was strengthening the Paddy Marketing Board by reviving abandoned storage facilities. He also cited increased fertilizer support, reduced medicine prices and lower cement prices as Government measures, while accusing previous administrations and opposition figures of creating or neglecting current problems.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Ravindra Bandara
AI summary Clean Sri Lanka was presented as a broad governance and cultural reform programme rather than a short-term street-cleaning initiative, with examples cited such as reduced presidential expenditure, fewer entourages and security arrangements, and ministers avoiding costly official residences. Ravindra Bandara said government members were not seeking bar permits, car permits or commissions, and argued that investigations into corruption were proceeding through commissions and the Attorney-General’s Department. He also referred to the Rs. 6,000 school-supplies payment for eligible students, including Samurdhi beneficiary families and children in smaller schools and care institutions, while saying beneficiary lists would be corrected. He urged the Opposition to offer constructive proposals and said the Government expected to continue its mandate and pursue local and provincial election victories.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna rose to raise a Point of Order before the Deputy Chairperson of Committees. No substantive argument, proposal, or question was recorded in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna stated that despite submitting a written request on 18 December, he had not been allotted speaking time more than a month later. He urged that his request be considered and warned that continued exclusion could undermine reconciliation after the 30-year conflict. He also noted that no committee had been appointed to take up his Privilege matter.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva SJB
AI summary Dr. Harsha de Silva sought confirmation from the Chair that his remaining speaking time was still eight minutes.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva SJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva expressed support for the “Clean Sri Lanka” concept, including its environmental, social and moral objectives, while noting that the public currently perceives it mainly as an environmental cleanup and enforcement action affecting three-wheelers and buses. He questioned the Minister of Justice on whether a reported remand connected to the VFS transaction was accurate and whether it was carried out under the Clean Sri Lanka initiative.
- The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law – Minister of Justice and National Integration JJB
AI summary The Minister clarified that the matter raised by the Member does not fall under the Clean Sri Lanka programme but relates to the justice process. He explained that his earlier speech had separately addressed Clean Sri Lanka activities and the rule of law, and that the Member’s reference concerned the latter.
Justice & Human Rights Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva SJB
AI summary Asked whether any individual had been remanded in connection with the matter under discussion.
Justice & Human Rights Full speech → - The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara JJB
AI summary Harshana Nanayakkara stated that, to his knowledge, punishments had been imposed at the relevant time.
Justice & Human Rights Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva SJB
AI summary Hon. Harsha de Silva urged the Government to define “Clean Sri Lanka” as including action against corruption and called for implementation of the Committee on Public Finance’s 665-page report, including investigation of the visa issue. He said Opposition members had also avoided privileges and used unpaid volunteers in initiatives such as 1990 Suwaseriya, and expressed willingness to cooperate if the programme is properly implemented. He questioned the Government’s handling of electricity tariffs, alleging misleading claims about CEB losses despite large profits, and said PUCSL consultation showed greater tariff reductions were possible. He also called for transparent regulation of petroleum and water pricing through the PUCSL, with proper consultations to identify and correct errors.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva SJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva expressed support for efforts to reduce littering, noting that public behaviour had improved compared to the past. He said they were willing to assist fully and urged that the programme be implemented properly.
Environment Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Sanjeewa Ranasingha JJB
AI summary Hon. Sanjeewa Ranasingha defended the Clean Sri Lanka programme against Opposition claims that it is unclear, arguing that any ambiguity should be clarified while proceeding with its broader social, economic and political reform aims. He linked the programme to the Government’s electoral mandate, saying it seeks to address economic collapse, social problems, corruption of political culture and public discontent inherited from previous administrations. He also cited recent peaceful elections and restraint in the use of official privileges as evidence of a changed political culture, and rejected Opposition criticism on issues such as rice and paddy as politically motivated.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake NDF
AI summary Chamara Sampath Dasanayake said Customs trade unions had begun action after 270 containers were allegedly released without inspection, and tabled the unions’ letter to the Director-General of Customs, raising concerns about possible contents and revenue loss. He reiterated allegations about expenditure on the Clean Sri Lanka launch, claiming his intervention reduced the cost from Rs. 7 million to Rs. 900,000, and questioned who funded related Christmas lighting, drone shows and entertainment. While stating that Clean Sri Lanka was a positive initiative, he argued that it should first address shootings, homicides, the underworld and drug trafficking before focusing on waste management.
- The Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake NDF
AI summary Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake argued that drug traffickers and underworld figures should be dealt with harshly, citing the Philippines as an example, and said “Clean Sri Lanka” must also address corrupt or unsuitable public officials, including recent appointments in the Uva Provincial Council. He urged the Government to ensure proper appointments and said the Opposition’s role is to expose such matters in Parliament. He also defended former Presidents’ entitlements and security arrangements, criticised attacks on President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and on former leaders such as Mahinda Rajapaksa and Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, and called on the Government and the President to act with greater decorum and responsibility.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Chamara Sampath Dasanayake NDF
AI summary Chamara Sampath Dasanayake briefly asked whether his allotted time had ended and thanked the Chair. No substantive policy issue, proposal, or question was raised.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake began his contribution during the Committee Stage by addressing the Deputy Chairperson, but no substantive remarks, arguments, questions, or proposals are included in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Hon. Bimal Rathnayake rejected allegations made against the Governor of the Western Province, stating that he was appointed as a respected public figure and not for party affiliation or government business interests. He urged Members to act responsibly when referring to public officials who are not present in the House and to rely on evidence rather than hearsay. He also responded to remarks on Clean Sri Lanka expenditure, saying any claims or bills could be presented and noting that some activities may have been carried out without government spending.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya - Prime Minister and Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education JJB
AI summary Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya defended the Government’s Clean Sri Lanka programme as a participatory initiative aimed at ethical, environmental and social responsibility, arguing that national transformation requires public consent, dialogue and voluntary involvement rather than top-down action. She said citizens, philanthropists and businesspeople had already contributed voluntarily, and contrasted this with what she described as the previous political culture’s misuse of public and private actors for personal gain. She also criticised the Opposition for lacking substance and consistency, and said the Government was changing political culture by enabling independent public officials, strengthening the rule of law, and ending political interference in areas such as teacher appointments.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - An Hon. Member
AI summary The Member made no substantive contribution beyond saying “That’s all.”
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya criticized opposition members for using parliamentary time for publicity, including short clips or social media attention, rather than substantive debate. She said that if members wished to speak or criticize, time could be arranged through television or other media, and urged them not to undermine the dignity and quality expected of Parliament.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Mano Ganesan SJB
AI summary Mano Ganesan asked the Prime Minister to clarify the “Clean Sri Lanka” concept for Parliament and the public. He noted that he had been waiting to raise questions on the matter and urged the Prime Minister to address it directly rather than continue responding to a previous Member’s speech.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB
AI summary Harini Amarasuriya responded to criticism during the debate, stating that the Government had repeatedly explained the Clean Sri Lanka project and that she had already addressed it as Prime Minister. She said it was her duty to answer what she described as baseless allegations and rejected attempts to instruct her on how to participate in debate.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara sought a brief clarification from the Chair. No substantive policy argument or proposal was presented in the excerpt provided.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB
AI summary Dr. Harini Amarasuriya asked the Deputy Chairperson of Committees to allow her to continue speaking, stating that the interruption was not a Point of Order.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya made a procedural request to the Chair, asking that the time taken for the interruption or exchange not be deducted from her allotted speaking time.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara raised a Point of Order. No substantive argument, proposal, or policy issue was presented in the recorded excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB
AI summary The member rejected a proposal made in the debate to emulate extrajudicial measures associated with the Philippines in addressing drug crimes, such as taking people to sea and killing them. She stated that the Government has no intention or justification to act unlawfully in implementing the Clean Sri Lanka programme.
Law & Order Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya JJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) (Ms.) Harini Amarasuriya stated that the Government is committed to restoring the rule of law and ending past practices of arbitrary use of power, abductions, and killings, citing cases such as Eknaligoda, Richard de Zoysa, Lasantha Wickrematunge, and the Trincomalee student killings. Responding to Hon. Mano Ganesan, she described “Clean Sri Lanka” as the political change of ending impunity and ensuring Ministers and MPs act within the law and Constitution. She urged Members who claim to support change and the country’s welfare to demonstrate it through their conduct in Parliament.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa questioned whether the Government, its 159 Members, and implementing agencies have a clear common understanding, Terms of Reference, and guidelines for the Clean Sri Lanka programme. He argued that similar initiatives under previous governments were criticized and later discontinued after changes of government, and called for a permanent, consistent process. He also criticized enforcement actions on vehicle accessories, asking whether safety concerns are genuinely addressed if violations are resolved through payment under the Motor Traffic Act, and urged clearer instructions to relevant officials.
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake, as Minister in charge of Transport, challenged the assertion that making a payment would resolve the matter under discussion. He asked the Member to identify who had provided that information.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa asked the Leader of the House whether he had instructed the relevant parties to act in accordance with the law. The intervention was a brief procedural question seeking clarification on compliance with legal requirements.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake briefly corrected the record, stating that a prior characterization of his remarks was inaccurate. No substantive policy proposal or legislative issue was raised in this intervention.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa briefly reiterated a question or request already raised in the debate. No substantive policy argument, proposal, or legislative issue is contained in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake sought a specific response or clarification from the relevant party. The intervention was procedural in nature and did not include a substantive policy argument or detailed proposal.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa briefly intervened to direct a specific question or request to another participant in the debate. The remark contains no substantive policy argument, legislative proposal, or detailed issue beyond indicating that he was asking the matter specifically.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Hon. Bimal Rathnayake challenged a claim that there would be no issue regarding accessories once payment was made. He asked the relevant party to identify who had made that statement.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa asked for a direct clarification on whether the law now prohibits fixing parts that are otherwise permitted. He requested a brief yes-or-no answer.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake, speaking as Minister of Transport, demanded a direct answer to his question and asked the Member to identify who made the relevant statement. He indicated that if the answer could not be provided immediately, it should be given later, while pressing for clarity in the exchange.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa noted that further argument with the Minister was unnecessary and directed the issue to the Police, pointing out that the Minister responsible for the Police was present in the House.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Ananda Wijepala - Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs JJB
AI summary Minister Ananda Wijepala denied that the Police had made the statement being attributed to them and questioned which police authority or source was being referred to.
Law & Order Full speech → - The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB
AI summary Ananda Wijepala briefly interjected to reject or dispute a preceding assertion, stating that “we do know.” No substantive policy position, proposal, or question was developed in the intervention.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa questioned the Minister on whether the relevant items could be registered and challenged any implication that registration would prevent accidents. He also criticized the conduct of the Government side, referring to the Prime Minister’s remarks about the Opposition and alleging similar behaviour within Government group meetings.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB
AI summary Ananda Wijepala urged the Member to present evidence when speaking in Parliament and not rely on hearsay.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake requested a clear answer to an earlier question, noting that the President had assigned the relevant subject to him. He asked the Member not to evade the matter and, if unable to answer during the speech, to provide the information later, including who had made the referenced statement.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly interjected to state that the matter being referred to was from the Police, addressing the Leader of the House. No substantive argument, proposal, or policy position was developed in the excerpt provided.
Law & Order Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa argued that when Opposition Members raise public concerns in Parliament, they should be heard without interruption or politicization. He referred to issues involving the Sri Lanka Police and cautioned against turning parliamentary proceedings into a forum for political revenge, contrasting this with what he characterized as the conduct of an anti-corruption commission.
- The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB
AI summary Ananda Wijepala objected to a statement he considered false and insulting to the Police. He called on the House not to malign the Police with lies, framing the remark as a defence of the institution’s reputation.
Law & Order Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa cautioned against politicized criticism of the Police Commission, state officials, and the military. He argued that security-related concerns should be raised through the Security Council rather than at political rallies, warning against public statements that could undermine state institutions.
- The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB
AI summary Ananda Wijepala rejected accusations directed at the Police and challenged Opposition members’ credibility in raising issues of murder and journalist killings. He referred to the deaths of Wasim Thajudeen and Lasantha Wickrematunge, alleging that such killings occurred under the previous Rajapaksa Government and questioning whether Namal Rajapaksa and others had the moral authority to speak on the matter.
- The Hon. Ananda Wijepala JJB
AI summary Hon. Ananda Wijepala objected to language used in the debate and referred to the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda. He asserted that Eknaligoda was disappeared, indicating the matter should be treated as a serious enforced disappearance rather than discussed dismissively.
Justice & Human Rights Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa stated that the point at issue was not his own claim, but a statement made by the President. The intervention appears to respond to an exchange in the House by attributing responsibility for the remark to the President.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa urged the Minister in charge of Police to address governance and law enforcement issues substantively rather than limiting them to election rhetoric, referencing the Minister’s past role in anti-corruption investigations under the good governance Government. He said the Opposition had a responsibility to question the Government on public concerns and denied making personal accusations, while criticizing what he described as anger and hostility in response to scrutiny. He also referred to the Government’s “Clean Sri Lanka” initiative, arguing that it should begin with changes in political conduct and attitudes.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa criticized the implementation of the “Clean Sri Lanka” initiative, arguing that it lacks clear objectives, guidelines and a formal TOR for officials and Members. He urged the Government to model it on structured international programmes such as “Clean India,” “America the Beautiful” and “Clean and Green Singapore,” beginning with Parliamentarians and extending through schools, universities and vocational institutes. He also warned against using the programme for political purposes, including the intimidation or suppression of the Opposition.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa said that, regardless of which party is in government, Sri Lanka’s state institutions must be protected, including the Tri-Forces, Police, Police Commission and Independent Commissions. He urged the Prime Minister to issue clear guidelines, terms of reference and regulations to state institutions for the “Clean Sri Lanka” programme, and to evaluate whether its objectives are being met.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Hon. Nihal Galappaththi rose on a Point of Order. No substantive issue, proposal, or question is included in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara asks what the Point of Order is, seeking clarification on the procedural issue being raised.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Nihal Galappaththi made a brief confrontational remark, telling another party that the matter was not their concern and instructing them to remain in place. No policy issue, legislative proposal, or substantive parliamentary question was raised.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara objected that he was not being allowed to raise a Point of Order while another Member was permitted to speak. He requested that the House hear the point being raised.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Hon. Nihal Galappaththi briefly sought permission to raise a matter, indicating that the Chair could rule if it was not a Point of Order. He requested a little time to proceed.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna
AI summary The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna stated that he was not being given an opportunity to speak in the debate. He indicated that he may only get such an opportunity in two months.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi’s recorded intervention contains only an address to the Deputy Chairperson of Committees and no substantive remarks. No policy position, proposal, question, or demand is stated in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna
AI summary A brief intervention requested additional time to speak. No substantive policy position, question, or proposal was presented in the provided text.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara briefly queried whether another Member had been holding the microphone for several minutes, raising a procedural concern about floor conduct during the debate.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna
AI summary The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna briefly challenged the Government to allow him time to speak, requesting one minute and framing the request as a test of the Government’s willingness to permit his intervention.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Nihal Galappaththi briefly remarked that he had listened to Hon. Namal’s speech and characterized it as unusual and ineffectual, using a metaphor suggesting criticism without substance or consequence. No specific policy proposal, legislative issue, or formal demand was raised.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara questions the relevance or procedural basis of an unspecified matter, asking what Point of Order is being raised. The intervention appears to seek clarification from the Chair or the member speaking on whether the issue qualifies as a valid Point of Order.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Nihal Galappaththi makes a brief, emotive reference to intergenerational responsibility, invoking fathers, grandfathers, sons, and elders. No specific policy proposal, legislative issue, or procedural demand is identifiable from the excerpt provided.
Ethnic Reconciliation & Devolution Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara briefly intervened to query or challenge the proceedings, addressing the Deputy Chairperson of Committees and asking for clarification on what was taking place.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara raised a point of order questioning whether another Member’s remarks were permissible under parliamentary procedure. He sought clarification from the Chair on whether the Member could speak in that manner.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Nihal Galappaththi reflects on his past, present, and future in political life, referring to his experiences and continued role in public service. The remarks appear to be personal and contextual rather than focused on a specific bill, policy proposal, or parliamentary demand.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara requested the Chair to make a ruling on whether another Member’s manner of speaking was procedurally acceptable. The intervention was a point of order seeking clarification on conduct in the debate.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Hon. Nihal Galappaththi stated that the public had delivered a final verdict through the votes held on September 8 and November 14. The remark emphasized acceptance of the election outcomes as conclusive.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara raised a point of order questioning whether another Member should be permitted to continue delivering a speech in that manner. He urged the Chair to make an immediate ruling on the propriety of the speech.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nihal Galappaththi JJB
AI summary Hon. Nihal Galappaththi criticized another Member for allegedly failing to attend District Development and Divisional Development Committee meetings. He accused the Member of using Parliament to make disruptive criticisms despite not participating in local development forums.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly rose on a point of order or clarification, stating that his name had been mentioned by another Member. No substantive policy issue, proposal, or legislative matter was raised in the excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa briefly responded after his name was mentioned, acknowledging Hon. Nihal Galappaththi as a senior MP from his area whom he respects. He declined to engage further, adding only a figurative remark that “pots can be broken only because they are empty.”
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna - Minister of Plantation and Community Infrastructure JJB
AI summary The Minister defended the Government’s Clean Sri Lanka programme as a structured national initiative to transform the country’s political and social system, citing the establishment of a Presidential Task Force, district and local committees, office facilities and funding since its launch on 1 January. He rejected Opposition claims that the programme lacked a plan and argued that systemic change required lawful action against corruption and abuse rather than merely changing political leaders. He also referred to alleged past misconduct, including the Badulla school principal incident and financial irregularities involving Eppawala phosphate exports, stating that related files had been referred for investigation and that decisions would be taken according to law.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara said the “Clean Sri Lanka” programme lacked a clear concept paper, implementation plan, institutional responsibilities and terms of reference, despite being debated for two days. He compared it with Singapore’s “Keep Singapore Clean” initiative, arguing that successful programmes require defined actions, public participation, infrastructure and enforcement mechanisms. While expressing strong support for the objective, he criticised inconsistent interpretations of the programme by police, MPs and officials, and urged the Government to present a proper plan before implementation.
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara requested that he be allowed to continue speaking within his allotted time, noting that others could respond afterward. The intervention concerned the management of speaking turns during the debate.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna JJB
AI summary Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna rose on a point of personal reference, requesting permission to respond because his name had been mentioned in the debate.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara briefly responds to a time-allocation issue in the debate, asking that the time be deducted from the other side’s allotted speaking time.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna JJB
AI summary Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna appears only to address or yield to Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, with no substantive remarks, policy position, question, or proposal recorded in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara urged that the matter under discussion not be delayed or prolonged further. The intervention was brief and procedural in nature, calling for the process to move forward without dragging it out.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna JJB
AI summary Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna responded to a reference to his name, stating that his earlier remarks had been misinterpreted. He clarified that the intention was to remove certain elements and establish the proposed order, and expressed regret that the point had not been understood.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara questioned whether the Clean Sri Lanka programme has clear targets and an implementation plan comparable to India’s Swachh Bharat Mission, particularly on sanitation and waste management. He argued that responsibility should be centred on Local Authorities rather than Divisional Secretariats, citing expert views, and called for a circular to that effect. He highlighted that most daily garbage generated in Sri Lanka is not collected by Local Authorities and asked what specific plan exists to address this.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara asked how much speaking time remained, noting that he had begun his speech at 2.27 p.m.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara briefly intervened to request that additional speaking time be taken from the Minister’s allocated time. The remark appears to concern the management of debate time during the parliamentary proceedings.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara proposed granting stronger powers to Local Authorities to require households to clean and maintain the road frontage near their homes, including issuing notices and fines where necessary. He argued that Pradeshiya Sabhas and related agencies lack manpower to maintain road reserves and suggested new legal provisions to support a national clean-up programme. He also called for improved public toilet maintenance, including within Parliament, citing poor conditions in common facilities as an issue the programme should address first.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara urged that the Clean Sri Lanka programme include public education on hygienic toilet use, especially for children, and practical measures to maintain clean, dry facilities and repair minor defects. He said the initiative should go beyond addressing theft and corruption by presenting a concept paper, assigning duties to officials and Local Authorities, and implementing a comprehensive national cleaning plan.
- The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara urged the Government to make public toilets mandatory at 25-kilometre intervals and ensure their maintenance, clarifying that the issue requires enforceable implementation rather than isolated construction. He called for a concrete plan and appealed for constructive discussion without partisan mudslinging.
Infrastructure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Chairperson of Committees procedural
- The Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara, Attorney-at-Law JJB
AI summary Hon. Harshana Nanayakkara moved that Hon. Sanjeewa Ranasingha take the Chair during proceedings. The motion was put to the House and agreed to, after which the Deputy Chairperson of Committees left the Chair and Hon. Sanjeewa Ranasingha assumed it.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - Hon. (Mrs.) Saroja Savithri Paulraj - Minister of Women and Child Affairs JJB
AI summary The Minister said the Clean Sri Lanka Project is part of the Government’s mandate to reform political culture and public administration, rejecting Opposition claims that the programme or the Government would fail. She cited recent measures including debt servicing, economic stabilization, increased Aswasuma benefits, fertilizer subsidies, pension increases, schoolbook support, and reduced ministerial expenditure as evidence of progress. She also referred to stronger excise revenue collection and enforcement against tax defaulters, arguing that the Government would continue efforts to curb waste, corruption, and divisive political campaigns.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. M. Nizam Kariapper, PC SJB
AI summary Hon. M. Nizam Kariapper said the Clean Sri Lanka concept was acceptable in principle but questioned the legality and administrative basis for implementation through a Presidential Task Force when many functions fall under local authorities and provincial councils. He raised practical public sanitation issues, including inadequate train toilet facilities, and urged attention to implementation details. He also called for urgent intervention in flooding affecting the Kalmunai–Oluvil area in Ampara, citing breaches and canal obstructions threatening agriculture, and requested immediate support from the Presidential Secretariat and district coordination bodies.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Nishantha Perera JJB
AI summary Hon. Nishantha Perera defended the Government’s “Clean Sri Lanka” programme as part of its broader agenda of digitization, poverty eradication, and changing political culture under President Anura Dissanayake. He argued that the Opposition was misrepresenting the programme and was responsible for past damage to agriculture, public institutions, and governance standards. He cited a coastal clean-up initiative in Galle District as evidence of public participation and said the Government would continue efforts to rebuild the economy and promote a “beautiful Sri Lanka.”
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Imran Maharoof SJB
AI summary The Hon. Imran Maharoof questioned the clarity and implementation of the Clean Sri Lanka programme, arguing that it should address systemic issues such as corruption in the health sector rather than symbolic or poorly understood actions. He raised concerns about the absence of Tamil-speaking members on the appointed committee and questioned transfer practices in the Eastern Province, particularly the representation of Tamil and Muslim officers. He also criticized the Government for discussing issues such as allowances and security for former Presidents at public rallies rather than through Cabinet or Parliament, urging it to use its majority and institutional control to address public problems directly.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Manoj Rajapaksha JJB
AI summary Hon. Manoj Rajapaksha defended the Clean Sri Lanka Project as a flagship programme of the Government aimed at addressing corruption, institutional decay, and social and economic deterioration across sectors. He said the Government had a national mandate across communities to rebuild the country and was proceeding through a planned process involving State institutions, village communities and volunteers, with January focused on awareness. He rejected Opposition criticism that the Government lacked vision or had delivered nothing, and cited forthcoming village-level measures from February to address wild elephant and monkey damage to cultivation, including in Kegalle, as part of the project’s wider objectives.
- The Hon. M.S. Uthumalebbe SLMC
AI summary Hon. M.S. Uthumalebbe supported the Clean Sri Lanka programme but urged the Government to apply its principles inclusively, including by appointing Tamil and Muslim representatives to the Presidential implementation team. He raised concerns about alleged discrimination in senior judicial appointments, the absence of a Muslim Cabinet Minister, and requested that details of Muslim COVID-19 victims subjected to forced cremation be tabled in Parliament. He also called for the expedited and proportionate allocation of Saudi-funded houses in Ampara District to tsunami-affected residents, particularly in Akkaraipattu.
- The Hon. (Dr.) Nandana Millagala JJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Nandana Millagala defended the Government’s Clean Sri Lanka National Programme, arguing that it is intended to address the hardships of disadvantaged communities and is based on prior planning, situational analysis, and the vision of “A Beautiful Island – A Happy People.” He rejected Opposition claims that the programme lacks purpose or financing, stating that detailed funding arrangements will follow through Budget allocations and donations. He said the programme will proceed on social, ethical, and environmental pillars and invited wider participation in implementing related national and civil initiatives.
Environment Full speech → - The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake moved that Hon. Chanaka Madugoda take the Chair. The House agreed to the motion, after which Hon. Sanjeewa Ranasingha left the Chair and Hon. Chanaka Madugoda assumed it.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Chithral Fernando, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Chithral Fernando said criticism of the Clean Sri Lanka programme should be treated as constructive and not as hostility to the country. He argued that while the programme’s name or inspiration is not important, its implementation lacks clarity, particularly regarding timelines, coordination, and the role and remuneration of Task Force members described as volunteers. He called for accountability over any public expenditure, clearer planning, and consistency in Government messaging. He also urged the Government to apply the programme’s stated goal of changing political culture within its own ranks, citing the former Speaker’s issue as an example.
- The Hon. Dammika Patabendi - Minister of Environment JJB
AI summary Minister Dammika Patabendi said Clean Sri Lanka is a central NPP Government programme built on environmental, social and ethical development, not merely a sanitation or environmental campaign. He outlined plans for safer roads, public sanitation, food safety, disability-friendly cities, low-noise zones, anti-corruption enforcement, behavioural change, and ecological restoration, implemented through a Presidential Task Force and State administrative structures down to village level. He argued that the programme reflects the public mandate received at the recent elections and is intended to mobilize the State, civil society, volunteers and citizens toward social reform and environmental protection.
- The Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka SJB
AI summary The Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka said the Clean Sri Lanka programme, launched by the President on 1 January, had not been adequately explained to the public, Cabinet, Government MPs, or implementing agencies, leading to confusion over its scope. He urged the Government to improve communication and public awareness, and to focus on practical infrastructure needs including waste collection and disposal, waste-to-energy options, tourist sanitary facilities, and sanitation in remote villages and schools.
- The Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka SJB
AI summary Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka urged that the programme under discussion be continued with a clear plan, consistent workflow, and a proper legal framework, noting apparent contradictions in its legal basis. He argued that its credibility depends on addressing waste and corruption in public service and politics, including through transparency over reported expenditure of about Rs. 7 million on the launch ceremony. He also called on the Government to set an example internally, referring to allegations that some ruling party politicians had presented false educational qualifications during the last General Election.
- The Hon. Wasantha Samarasinghe - Minister of Trade, Commerce, Food Security and Cooperative Development JJB
AI summary The Minister responded to a matter raised by Hon. Chamara Sampath, stating that no supporting information had been submitted despite a request to do so. He said any allegation or controversy should be substantiated with properly founded information before it can be considered.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka SJB
AI summary Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka stated that controversy was already being generated around a particular programme. He appeared to raise concern about the framing or public discussion of the programme, though the excerpt provided does not include further details on its content or his specific position.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Wasantha Samarasinghe JJB
AI summary Wasantha Samarasinghe objected to repeated claims in Parliament about an alleged controversy without evidence. He urged members making such claims to identify the specific issue or place and provide information, arguing that unsubstantiated references are unfair.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka SJB
AI summary Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka urged the Government to take stronger action to eliminate opportunities for bribery and address alleged mismanagement. He cited the continuing rice crisis, repeated failures in tenders to import rice, and delays in providing the fertilizer subsidy as examples of administrative failure requiring urgent attention.
- The Hon. Wasantha Samarasinghe - Minister of Trade, Commerce, Food Security and Cooperative Development JJB
AI summary Wasantha Samarasinghe clarified that the tender in question had not been rejected four times, responding to a claim or query raised by another Member. He indicated willingness to provide further explanation despite the other Member’s limited time.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Wasantha Samarasinghe - Minister of Trade, Commerce, Food Security and Cooperative Development JJB
AI summary The Minister clarified the status of Sathosa rice procurement tenders for 5,200 metric tons, stating that the first tender was not rejected but could not proceed because the two bidders did not individually meet the requirement to supply the full quantity under government procedure. He added that the second tender received no bids and the third was rejected on quality grounds, disputing claims that tenders had been repeatedly rejected.
- The Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka SJB
AI summary Hon. Suranga Rathnayaka urged the Government to act without mismanagement and to fulfil pledges made during its election campaign. He specifically called for swift legal action against major fraudsters, those implicated in the Central Bank bond scam, and cases referred to in the alleged 400 corruption files. He also asked the Government to deliver promised reductions in electricity tariffs and fuel prices by curbing ministerial commissions.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Dewananda Suraweera JJB
AI summary Hon. Dewananda Suraweera defended the National People’s Power Government’s Clean Sri Lanka programme as a five-year effort to rebuild the country through physical, environmental, social and moral reform. He argued that previous administrations had damaged public ethics, health, the environment and governance, and said the programme would address corruption, profiteering, narcotics networks and other harmful practices. He rejected Opposition criticism of the programme, cited the dispute over the cost of its launch ceremony, and called on MP Chamara Sampath to resign if the Government’s stated cost of Rs. 900,000 was correct.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Kaveenthiran Kodeeswaran ITAK
AI summary The member supported the Clean Sri Lanka initiative but raised objections to a proposed liquor outlet in Periya Neelavanai, citing a protest by more than 500 residents at the Kalmunai North Divisional Secretariat. He said the outlet had previously been closed after public opposition and that moves by 660816 Beverages Company Limited to reopen it would harm schoolchildren and daily wage earners. He urged the Government to uphold its pledge to cancel new liquor licences and take legal steps to prevent the shop from opening.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Bimal Rathnayake stated that the NPP Government has not issued any new liquor licences and said many existing licences were granted during the final months of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s administration. He explained that once issued legally, such licences cannot be cancelled by force but may be addressed through lawful administrative and social measures, which he offered to discuss separately.
- The Hon. Kaveenthiran Kodeeswaran ITAK
AI summary Hon. Kaveenthiran Kodeeswaran urged the Government to use presidential authority and legal or administrative measures to prevent the reopening of a liquor outlet in a residential area, citing harm to residents and students and public disappointment despite support given to the ruling party. He also raised the alleged forcible takeover by the Sri Lanka Army of Aalaiyadivembu Multi-Purpose Cooperative Society properties, stating that they were long-held cooperative assets used for paddy processing, rice distribution and employment. He requested that the properties be returned to the cooperative, referring to earlier Defence Ministry and Army instructions to restore them, and called for protection of farmers’ interests and lost livelihoods.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Ananda Wijepala - Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs JJB
AI summary The Minister defended the Government’s Clean Sri Lanka programme as a broad social, ethical, environmental, economic and political transformation, rather than a limited clean-up or road safety initiative, and said it has a plan, vision and roadmap with public participation. He argued that the Government inherited bankruptcy, social breakdown and crime, and said the Police have been depoliticized and are acting under the rule of law to address corruption, organized crime and road safety. He cited recent reductions in daily road accident deaths, the high public health burden of accidents, and arrests linked to organized crime, including members of the Armed Forces, Police and Civil Security Department, as evidence of ongoing enforcement efforts.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Chathura Galappaththi SJB
AI summary Hon. Chathura Galappaththi said he supported the objectives of the Clean Sri Lanka programme but questioned the absence of a concrete implementation plan, follow-up mechanisms, and clear operational targets. He proposed practical measures such as sustained monitoring of illegal dumping points using school environmental brigades, scouts, and environmental police, and argued that implementation should rely on existing local authority structures rather than new ad hoc village committees. Citing Singapore’s Green Plan and India’s Swachh Bharat Mission, he said successful cleanliness programmes require structured plans, targets, and statutory grounding. He also raised concerns about the local government electoral system, supported a return to proportional representation, and urged action on the cost-of-living and rice supply issues, including reviving a low-cost mechanized rice storage system piloted in 2012.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Bhagya Sri Herath, Attorney-at-Law JJB
AI summary Bhagya Sri Herath supported the motion seeking parliamentary and public backing for the Clean Sri Lanka programme, arguing that the Opposition had mischaracterized it as unclear despite its objectives being set out in the Gazette. He described the programme as a broad social, political, environmental and ethical transformation aimed at changing public attitudes and behaviour, rather than a narrowly timed project limited to activities such as bus regulation or waste collection. He maintained that the programme aligns with Government policy and does not conflict with the Constitution or other laws, urging critics to engage with its stated framework before raising objections.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Rohana Bandara
AI summary Hon. Rohana Bandara said the Clean Sri Lanka programme had a laudable concept, including environmental cleanliness and anti-corruption, but argued that its scope was unclear and too broad, causing inconsistent statements and implementation problems. He criticized what he described as performative enforcement actions affecting buses and three-wheelers, and urged the Government to proceed methodically through administrative mechanisms. He also alleged that the programme’s new task force and council structures could sideline legally established local authorities and District Coordinating Committees, and warned against using Clean Sri Lanka to build parallel political structures or consolidate party influence.
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Hon. Bimal Rathnayake moved to adjourn the day’s adjournment debate on the “Clean Sri Lanka” programme and to resume it on 22 January 2025.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- 9 Papers Answers to Written Questions: Landslide Risk Areas 10 speeches
- 10 Procedural Administrative Notices 3 speeches