Sitting of Wednesday, 6 August 2025
Source: Hansard PDF (parliament.lk) ↗ ·No. 1755159820030645 ·English daily/uncorrected Hansard
Order of business
Speeches load per item. Summaries shown here are AI-generated and labelled; verbatim text is on each speech page.
- 1 Opening Opening: National Audit (Amendment) Bill - Supreme Court Decision 1 speeches
- 2 Papers Papers: Tabling of Annual and Performance Reports 6 speeches
- 3 Petitions Petitions 9 speeches
- 4 Oral question Oral Question: Poverty Eradication Programmes (Q.59/2025) 32 speeches
- 5 Oral question Oral Question: Cases Filed by Attorney-General's Department (Q.2/2025) 13 speeches
- 6 Procedural Procedural: Record on Second Reading Debate - Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill 1 speeches
- 7 Oral question Oral Question: Sri Lanka Customs - Release of Containers without Inspection (Q.1/2025) 7 speeches
- 8 Oral question Oral Question: Ceylon Electricity Board Power Cut Decision (Q.1/2025) 8 speeches
- 9 Oral question Oral Question: Hospitals Governed under Central Provincial Council (Q.1/2025) 21 speeches
- 10 Oral question Oral Question: Agricultural Crop Export Producers and Regulatory Framework (Q.1/2025) 6 speeches
- 11 Oral question Oral Question (Standing Order 27(2)): Review of Policies in the Leasing Sector 6 speeches
- 12 Procedural Ministerial Statement: Response to Question on Foreign Direct Investment (2025-07-09) 7 speeches
- 13 Procedural Personal Explanations and Committee Resignations 7 speeches
- 14 Procedural Procedural: First Reading of Institute of Facilities Management Sri Lanka Bill 1 speeches
- 15 Debate Debate: Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill - Second Reading, Committee and Third Reading 93 speeches
- The Hon. Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Sajith Premadasa - Leader of the Opposition SJB
AI summary The Leader of the Opposition raised a Point of Order requesting equal opportunity for the Opposition to clarify matters when such an opportunity is given to the Government side.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Bimal Rathnayake JJB
AI summary Moved the Second Reading of the Bill and presented for approval two related items on the Order Paper: a Regulation under the Tobacco Tax Act and an Order under the Tea (Tax and Control of Exports) Act. The motion was then put before the House.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Kumara Jayakody - Minister of Energy JJB
AI summary Minister Kumara Jayakody introduced the Second Reading debate on the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, alongside related regulations under the Tobacco Tax Act and Tea (Tax and Control of Exports) Act. He stated that the electricity amendment is intended to bring a significant advancement in the electricity sector and framed it as an important measure for the Government.
- The Hon. Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Kumara Jayakody - Minister of Energy JJB
AI summary The Minister of Energy presented the Amendment as a reform of the electricity sector intended to create a transparent, competitive market while retaining full State ownership of public assets. He said the changes would prevent privatization of CEB assets, replace the proposed National Electricity Advisory Council with stronger core sector institutions, and develop structured wholesale, ancillary services, and retail market mechanisms. He also stated that CEB employees’ rights and benefits would be protected, and that the reforms followed consultations with staff, development partners, and experts, while rejecting pressure to alter government ownership.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker [The Hon. (Dr.) Rizvie Salih in the Chair]
AI summary The Deputy Speaker called on Hon. Kabir Hashim to speak and informed him that he had 16 minutes allotted.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kabir Hashim SJB
AI summary Kabir Hashim notes the allotted time for his speech as 18 minutes, addressing the Deputy Speaker. No substantive policy position, proposal, or question is presented in the provided excerpt.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) Ramanathan Archchuna Independent Group 17 - Jaffna
AI summary Ramanathan Archchuna raised a Point of Order citing Standing Order 92(2), which permits points of order except during a division. He complained that after being named and mocked on the live feed the previous day, he was not allowed to speak when he sought to raise a point of order, and requested that the Chair permit bona fide points of order.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Kabir Hashim SJB
AI summary Kabir Hashim argued that the proposed electricity sector amendment reverses earlier unbundling reforms by re-concentrating generation and distribution under CEB-linked structures, weakening accountability and risking continued monopoly control. He said the amendment leaves key restructuring decisions to unelected officials, creates insufficiently accountable minister-appointed committees, and introduces ambiguous dispatch terminology that could shift costs to consumers. He also questioned the handling of LTL Holdings and Sri Lanka Energies, requested clarification from the Attorney-General regarding an Article 78(3) objection, and warned against policies that would sideline renewable energy such as rooftop solar.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Raising a Point of Order, Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara informed Parliament that a Ceylon Petroleum Corporation bus carrying about 50 people was reportedly being taken to Maharagama to attack a protest. He asked that the Minister’s attention be drawn to the matter and indicated he could provide the bus number.
- The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Ravindra Bandara
AI summary Hon. Ravindra Bandara made a brief intervention addressing the Deputy Speaker and indicating a request. The provided excerpt is incomplete, so the substance of the request or any related policy or procedural matter cannot be determined.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Dayasiri Jayasekara sought clarification from the Chair regarding a number he had requested. The intervention appears to be a brief procedural query rather than a substantive contribution on policy or legislation.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Deputy Speaker procedural
- The Hon. Ravindra Bandara
AI summary Hon. Ravindra Bandara defended the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, arguing that it would restructure the Ceylon Electricity Board on a “scientific” basis while protecting workers’ pensions, EPF and employment rights. He rejected Opposition claims that the reforms amount to privatization, stating that hydropower assets would remain fully state-owned while private investment and competition would be enabled transparently. He criticized previous governments over alleged failures on LNG projects, solar power planning and emergency power procurements, and said the new framework would prevent such emergency purchases and better coordinate investment and sector reform.
- The Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Dayasiri Jayasekara said he would address the repayment of the monies in question. He also asserted that JVP Members had taken amounts between 2004 and 2008, citing figures of Rs. 1 million and Rs. 2 million, and requested that those details be stated accurately.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - The Hon. Mahinda Jayasinghe - Deputy Minister of Labour JJB
AI summary Deputy Minister Mahinda Jayasinghe supported the Electricity Bill, arguing that it reverses earlier efforts to break up and privatize the Ceylon Electricity Board, including proposals in 1996, 2002 and the previous Government’s legislation. He said the Bill would establish five fully state-owned companies, protect the rights of all 23,000 CEB workers including pensions and EPF, allow voluntary retirement, and ensure uninterrupted electricity supply. He rejected claims of privatization, noting that private power generation already exists through CEB purchases, and urged critics to identify genuine shortcomings rather than mislead the public.
- The Hon. S.M. Marikkar SJB
AI summary Hon. S.M. Marikkar argued that the electricity sector reforms amount to accelerated unbundling and potential privatization despite government denials, and questioned how the proposed transmission upgrades requiring US$5 billion would be financed. He raised concerns over the Cabinet-approved Sahasdanavi plant assumptions on diesel prices, exchange rates and generation costs, and asked on what basis incentives had been granted. He also alleged increasing Israeli-linked activity in areas such as Pottuvil, Arugam Bay and Sinnavillu, urging the Government to act on visa, land-leasing and security concerns. He further called for the removal of the Ministry Secretary from the chairmanship of LTL Holdings due to a potential conflict of interest, proposing that an Additional Secretary be appointed instead.
- The Hon. Riyas Farook JJB
AI summary Riyas Farook raised a point of order responding to a question about alleged leasing of parts of Sri Lanka to Israel and the role of Muslim Ministers. He challenged critics by asking why previous long-serving governments had not addressed the issue if such leases and constructions had occurred.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Manjula Suraweera Arachchi JJB
AI summary Hon. Manjula Suraweera Arachchi supported the Second Reading of the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, presenting it as a corrective transitional step away from the previous restructuring plan that he said would have split the Ceylon Electricity Board and reduced its workforce. He argued that Sri Lanka must move from an electricity-focused framework to a broader energy policy, prioritising renewable and environmentally friendly generation, lower tariffs, consumer protection, investment, and energy independence. He criticised past reliance on diesel and coal, alleged cartels and debt burdens within the sector, and assured CEB workers and the public that the Government would protect the institution, livelihoods, and public ownership.
- The Hon. Sajith Premadasa - Leader of the Opposition SJB
AI summary Sajith Premadasa argued that the 2025 Electricity Amendment Bill fails to ensure affordable, uninterrupted supply or promote clean energy, and instead weakens consumer protection, regulation, worker safeguards, and investor confidence. He accused the Government of undermining renewables while favouring thermal generation, citing the Sahasdanavi LNG project and PUCSL concerns over allegedly incorrect cost assumptions used for approval. He also criticized reductions in rooftop solar tariffs and said these had harmed solar businesses, jobs, and loan repayments, while accusing the Government of breaking election promises to reduce electricity bills due to adherence to IMF-linked tariff policy. He stated that the Opposition would prioritize and fully implement renewable energy in national policy.
- The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody responded to the Leader of the Opposition’s remarks on LNG, stating that the figures cited related to a 2021 tender and were based on evaluation variables no longer applicable. He said the tender had been closed in 2021 with Cabinet approval, and cautioned against relying on outdated or second-hand briefings.
Public Finance Full speech → - The Hon. (Dr.) Anil Jayantha - Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Economic Development JJB
AI summary The Minister said the Tobacco Tax regulation gives legal effect to increasing the beedi tax from Rs. 2 to Rs. 3, following the Budget decision and in line with inflation-based adjustments for other tobacco products. On the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, he argued that the 2024 framework was harmful and that the new amendments retain state governance over generation, transmission, distribution and system operations while allowing investment to improve capacity and efficiency. He said the policy aims to avoid fragmentation and privatization, reduce long-term electricity costs, support industrial development, and reach 70 per cent renewable energy by 2030 through expanded hydro, wind and solar generation. He also noted that the Government’s diplomatic engagement had reduced the United States’ reciprocal tariff rate from 44 per cent to 20 per cent.
- The Hon. Rohitha Abeygunawardhana NDF
AI summary Rohitha Abeygunawardhana said that public concern over the Electricity (Amendment) Bill centres on promised reductions in household electricity bills, recalling President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s 2024 pledge to cut bills by one-third and asking the Government to deliver visible relief. He urged the Minister to announce a clear commitment to reduce bills in 2025, while acknowledging the technical reforms under debate. He also raised a personal clarification regarding a COPA-related allegation involving a leased closed school, denying any connection to the named “Sarath Abeygunawardhana” and stating that parliamentary committees should refer matters to investigative bodies rather than assign guilt.
- The Hon. Anura Karunathilaka - Minister of Urban Development, Construction and Housing JJB
AI summary Minister Anura Karunathilaka said the amendments to electricity sector legislation are intended to strengthen state intervention and regulation while retaining scope for private sector participation. He argued that the 2024 Act weakened state control, particularly by allowing only about 50 per cent state ownership in the transmission company and enabling share divestment, and said the new amendments would make the transmission company fully state-owned. He stated that the reforms align with the NPP policy framework and would establish a national energy policy basis while restructuring the CEB into five principal state companies rather than 12 ad hoc entities.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Anura Karunathilaka JJB
AI summary The Member rejected claims that a government visit for discussion had been an attack on a protest, stating that the NPP Government would not obstruct democratic rights to protest or express views. He said the proposed Amendment Bill is intended to enable future transformational changes in the energy sector and invited support for its passage.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa criticised the Government’s Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, arguing that it retreats from its election pledge to repeal the 2024 Electricity Act and instead adopts a similar restructuring model under state ownership with investment access. He rejected claims that the power sector had been ruined over 40 years by previous administrations, asserting that the 2005-2015 period achieved full household electrification, lower tariffs and profitability for the CEB. He accused the Government and allied political forces of opposing or obstructing major generation projects such as Norochcholai, Uma Oya and Sampur, contributing to the lack of major power sector development since 2015.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Namal Rajapaksa criticized the Government’s handling of the Hambantota LNG power plant project, arguing that it weakened energy security while now calling for growth and private investment. He said the PUCSL’s independence would be compromised if it followed Finance Ministry instructions, and urged the Government to focus on adding new generation capacity. He rejected claims that CEB losses were due to excess employees, stating it had been profitable despite higher staffing, and referred to earlier opposition to Minister Kanchana’s electricity sector Bill.
- The Hon. Anura Karunathilaka JJB
AI summary Anura Karunathilaka stated that the matter in question was not destroyed but altered. The remark appears to be a clarification or response to an accusation, without providing further details in the excerpt.
Corruption & Governance Reform Full speech → - The Hon. Namal Rajapaksa, Attorney-at-Law SLPP
AI summary Hon. Namal Rajapaksa criticized the Government’s proposed restructuring of energy-related entities, arguing that consolidating bodies and placing an “independent” institution under the Ministry of Finance undermines independence. He questioned the absence of provisional approvals for renewable energy projects during the Government’s 10 months in office, asked about the progress of investors and tender winners, and warned that delays in new generation capacity affect tariffs and national security. He also called for action against bidders who win low-price tenders but fail to implement projects.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. (Mrs.) Geetha Herath, Attorney-at-Law JJB
AI summary Hon. Geetha Herath argued that reforms to the power sector are necessary to reduce excessive costs, improve efficiency, ensure reliable supply, and lower tariffs, noting that the Ceylon Electricity Board’s 1969 framework is outdated. She stated that the proposed Amendments replace the 2024 model, which she said risked privatization through 12 companies, with four State-owned companies covering generation, transmission, distribution and system control. She said private investment would be leveraged where needed, particularly in distribution, while ownership remains with the State. She also assured that the rights of about 23,000 employees, including jobs, pensions, EPF/ETF benefits, consent-based assignments and voluntary retirement options, would be protected.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved a procedural motion for Hon. Chanaka Madugoda to take the Chair. The motion was agreed to, after which Hon. Aravinda Senarath left the Chair and Hon. Chanaka Madugoda assumed it.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha SJB
AI summary Hon. Nalin Bandara Jayamaha raised concerns over the proposed LNG FSRU procurement, questioning the eligibility of the China Harbour Engineering Company–Engro joint venture after Engro’s exit, the apparent permission for a site change, and the cost of leasing rather than purchasing the unit. He alleged the arrangement may be corrupt, tabled related documents, and asked the Minister to scrutinize it, while also criticizing the halting of the LTL Holdings IPO and proposed CPC investment. He further warned against concentrating key CEB reform positions under one individual, requested recruitment of 167 qualified electrical superintendents, and argued that high electricity tariffs are undermining Sri Lanka’s export competitiveness despite US tariff preferences.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Ruwan Wijeweera JJB
AI summary Hon. Ruwan Wijeweera supported the amendment to the 2024 electricity sector legislation, arguing that it restructures the sector into five fully State-owned entities instead of the earlier model that allowed wider private ownership. He said the amendment protects employees’ jobs, salaries, allowances, pensions and EPF arrangements, while retaining energy as a strategically important public asset. He rejected concerns over PUCSL’s role, stating that “consultation” does not amount to approval and that tariff processes already involve public and institutional input. He argued that the reforms aim to improve reliability, transparency, efficiency, competition and ultimately reduce electricity tariffs.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Rauff Hakeem, Attorney-at-Law SJB
AI summary Hon. Rauff Hakeem criticized the Electricity Amendment Bill, arguing that it reverses prior unbundling efforts by reconsolidating generation, transmission and distribution under State control, which he said would deter private investment, weaken efficiency and strain public finances during the post-debt-crisis recovery. He questioned changes to the unbundling timeline and warned that proposed arrangements could weaken the PUCSL’s regulatory independence through Finance Ministry supervision. He also challenged the tariff treatment of small renewable energy projects, alleging discriminatory returns compared with larger dollar-pegged projects. He called for a high-powered, conflict-free inquiry into LTL shareholdings and alleged links involving former public servants, including hidden employee trust structures and the value of stakes following the IPO.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Janitha Ruwan Kodithuwakku - Deputy Minister of Ports and Civil Aviation JJB
AI summary Deputy Minister Janitha Ruwan Kodithuwakku said the proposed electricity sector amendments seek to modernize outdated laws while protecting State ownership, worker rights, national security and sovereignty. He rejected claims of privatization, stating that core functions would be unbundled into State-owned companies, with the National System Operator and transmission network remaining fully State-owned. He said private investment may be allowed in limited areas such as generation and grid extensions, under PPAs and licensing, to improve efficiency and reduce tariffs. He also outlined a long-term aim to make electricity distribution more competitive, allowing consumers greater choice of distributor based on price and service.
- The Hon. Ajith P. Perera SJB
AI summary Ajith P. Perera begins to raise an important point of order or procedural issue, but the provided excerpt contains no substantive details about the matter being raised.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Janitha Ruwan Kodithuwakku - Deputy Minister of Ports and Civil Aviation JJB
AI summary Requested to be allowed to finish his speech and indicated that he would respond afterward.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Ajith P. Perera SJB
AI summary Ajith P. Perera asked how the proposed new framework or Bill would further promote rooftop solar, noting that citizens had already added about 1,710 MW of rooftop capacity and around 200 MW of ground-mounted solar without State subsidies. He sought clarification on the model to be used and how the Bill would strengthen continued solar adoption.
- The Hon. Janitha Ruwan Kodithuwakku - Deputy Minister of Ports and Civil Aviation JJB
AI summary Deputy Minister Janitha Ruwan Kodithuwakku argued that existing rooftop and ground-mounted solar tariffs, set based on earlier cost structures, should be revised to reflect current costs. He said the payback period for rooftop solar can be unusually short and stated that the Government would introduce a tariff structure fair to both consumers and utility providers.
- The Hon. K. Kader Masthan SLLP
AI summary Hon. K. Kader Masthan raised concerns during the debate on the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill about delays in electricity connections in the Vanni District due to shortages of poles, insulators and wires, and frequent power cuts in Mannar despite the presence of wind power projects. He said residents oppose wind plants on Mannar Island because of impacts on fisheries, flooding and land use, and proposed relocating such projects to other areas of Mannar District, urging that these matters be addressed at a scheduled meeting with the Minister. He also objected to CEB-related land allocations to companies in Muthunagar, Trincomalee, affecting long-standing farmers, and requested that remaining land be formally given to them. He further asked for free or affordable electricity connections for low-income households, noting that about 2,500 families are waiting for assistance.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Mayilvaganam Jegatheeswaran JJB
AI summary Hon. Mayilvaganam Jegatheeswaran raised concerns over wind power projects and ilmenite mining in Mannar, stating that current activities arise from approvals granted by previous governments and not new permissions from the present Government. He said earlier approvals lacked consultation with local communities and religious leaders, and announced a parliamentary meeting with Vanni MPs, ministers, officials, religious leaders, fisheries representatives and civil society to review the issues. He stated that the Government would consider local concerns, reassess field impacts, and make decisions aimed at protecting fishers’ livelihoods.
- The Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva SJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Harsha de Silva opposed the proposed amendments to the electricity law, arguing that they reverse the investment and competition framework established by the 2024 Act, which he said was intended to reduce tariffs, improve efficiency, and support private participation where appropriate. He stated that multilateral agencies including ADB, IFC and JICA, as well as business and sector stakeholders, had warned the Government against the changes, and he tabled related correspondence. He questioned the feasibility of financing major transmission investments through public borrowing, citing concerns over CEB debt risk and borrowing costs, and argued that higher costs would ultimately be passed on to consumers and industry.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Najith Indika JJB
AI summary The Hon. (Dr.) Najith Indika defended the Government’s electricity sector amendment as a planned restructuring measure consistent with its pre-election commitment to reduce tariffs systematically and protect national energy interests. He said the Bill preserves 100 per cent State ownership, removes the earlier model allowing partial private sale of entities, and still recognises existing private participation, especially in renewables. He rejected claims of job losses, stating that current CEB employees would be protected and contrasting this with a pre-election circular proposing major staff reductions. He also noted the previous day’s parliamentary vote concerning the former IGP, recording that 177 Members voted in favour and none against.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. (Dr.) Najith Indika JJB
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Najith Indika criticized the absence of many Opposition Members during a vote, arguing that it was unreasonable for around 30 of 40 Members not to participate when several had attended parts of the debate. He named several absent senior Members and said those who raised issues in the debate should have remained to vote.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Anura Karunathilaka JJB
AI summary Anura Karunathilaka formally moved that Hon. Prof. Sena Nanayakkara take the Chair as Presiding Member. The motion was agreed to, after which Hon. Chanaka Madugoda vacated the Chair and Hon. Prof. Sena Nanayakkara assumed it.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Rishad Bathiudeen SJB
AI summary Hon. Rishad Bathiudeen raised concerns during the debate on the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill about the proposed wind power project in Mannar, saying local communities and representatives had not been adequately consulted despite ongoing protests. He said residents were not opposed to renewable energy or development, but objected to projects that affect fisheries, tourism, livelihoods and future economic prospects without providing local benefits, and requested that the project be shifted from Mannar Island to suitable mainland areas. He also criticized what he described as unequal treatment of foreign nationals, alleging preferential access for Israelis while Indian workers were deported, causing difficulties for farmers in harvesting.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. K. Ilankumaran JJB
AI summary Hon. K. Ilankumaran supported the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, arguing that it protects CEB employees’ jobs, salaries and allowances while enabling private investment and strengthening the electricity sector to deliver lower tariffs. He said past mismanagement had burdened consumers and stated that the Government would pursue scientifically assessed renewable energy projects, including clarifying concerns over Mannar wind power with Vanni District MPs and the Minister. He also rejected allegations about the Minister’s Mannar visit and about the Justice Minister’s remarks on mass graves, saying the Government had funded excavations and would act through proper legal channels.
- The Hon. Muneer Mulaffer - Deputy Minister of National Integration JJB
AI summary The Deputy Minister responded to remarks by Hon. Rishad Bathiudeen concerning Arugam Bay and Israel, stating that the issue predated the current Government and traced it to support given under a previous UNP Government. He noted continuing concerns in the Arugam Bay area, including among doctors and other stakeholders, and urged that political debate be conducted without racism or religious extremism while upholding a Sri Lankan identity.
- The Hon. Eranga Weeraratne - Deputy Minister of Digital Economy JJB
AI summary Eranga Weeraratne said the proposed amendments to the Sri Lanka Electricity Act are intended to further restructure the CEB by separating system operation, transmission, generation and distribution functions while retaining key entities under full government ownership. He argued that competitive bidding, independent generation including renewables, and digital tools such as smart grids, smart meters, AI, digital tendering and land portals would improve transparency, attract investment, reduce losses and lower tariffs over time. He also stated that the transition would include employment protections, a government-owned employee welfare and pension fund, voluntary retirement options, and training for affected workers.
- The Hon. M.A.M. Thahir ACMC
AI summary Participating in the debate on the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill, Hon. M.A.M. Thahir argued that CEB restructuring and wider economic reforms have not provided relief to poor households, public servants, or small businesses. He highlighted electricity and water disconnections, including during the crisis period, and questioned the absence of measures such as lower tariffs, subsidized new connections, or assistance for Samurdhi and Aswesuma beneficiaries. He called for reforms that improve services while addressing the cost-of-living burden on ordinary consumers.
- The Hon. Arkam Ilyas JJB
AI summary Hon. Arkam Ilyas supported the electricity sector amendment, arguing that it would improve service quality, introduce competition, protect consumers, and maintain 100 percent state ownership while safeguarding CEB employees’ jobs and allowances. He said the Bill addresses supply reliability issues, enables consumer choice among licensed providers, and creates scope for competitive generation and overseas opportunities for state-linked power entities. He also criticized past emergency power purchases as costly, called for stricter regulation of such procurement, and urged a review of overly expensive technical standards to avoid waste.
- The Hon. (Dr.) Elayathamby Srinath ITAK
AI summary Hon. (Dr.) Elayathamby Srinath supported legal amendments that improve electricity reliability and consumer benefits, while questioning whether the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill addresses practical barriers to solar adoption, especially in Batticaloa and the North and East. He raised concerns about delays in CEB connections, lack of transformers and three-phase supply, high costs for new household connections beyond 50 metres, and the relocation of electricity poles during road development. He also called for adequate CEB staffing, facilities, and disaster-resilient services in war-affected and infrastructure-poor areas, urging special attention to ensure affordable and continuous electricity access.
- The Hon. Asitha Niroshana Egoda Vithana JJB
AI summary Hon. Asitha Niroshana Egoda Vithana supported reform of the electricity and wider energy sector, arguing that the 1969 Ceylon Electricity Board framework no longer meets current national needs and must be updated as part of broader state reforms. He said the Bill aims to reduce electricity costs and tariffs, improve rural and island power supply, retain technical expertise, and modernize generation and distribution without harming workers. He rejected Opposition criticism, blamed past governments for CEB losses and staffing problems, and stated that the Government would protect employees through job security, mobility among state companies, and voluntary retirement options.
- The Hon. Ajith P. Perera SJB
AI summary Hon. Ajith P. Perera argued that decisions on CEB staffing should be based on a formal human resource audit and called for a collective agreement to safeguard employees’ jobs, benefits, and any voluntary retirement terms before reforms proceed. He criticised the Electricity Bill for inadequate consumer protections and for classifying LTL Holdings as a transmission company despite its domestic role in generation and manufacturing, urging the Government to bring amendments to correct these issues. He said the Opposition would support reforms that promote smart grids, renewable energy, lower tariffs, and investment, but could not vote for the Bill in its current form.
- The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna - Minister of Plantation and Community Infrastructure JJB
AI summary The Minister defended the Sri Lanka Electricity (Amendment) Bill as part of necessary structural reforms to generation, transmission, distribution and operations, arguing that past governments failed to ensure reliable and affordable electricity despite long periods in office. He said the Government’s new legal framework is intended to support economic growth and social welfare, though results may take time to become visible. He contrasted current Opposition criticism with the former Opposition’s stance on projects such as Uma Oya, stating that they opposed developments only where environmental and social harm was alleged, citing court action and compensation related to damaged houses, dried wells and affected farmland.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna JJB
AI summary Hon. K.V. Samantha Viddyarathna defended the Government’s energy and labour policies, arguing that it is ending corruption, accelerating development, and making structural changes to increase electricity generation and improve the CEB’s efficiency. He contrasted current wage increases with past treatment of public servants and workers, presenting the Government as protecting workers’ rights. He also supported regulations under the Tea (Export Duty and Control) Act to levy Rs. 3 per kilogram of exported tea, with proceeds credited to the Sri Lanka Tea Board for fertilizer support, cultivation promotion, and market development. He said the Government aims to restore and modernize the tea industry, including the standing of “Ceylon Tea,” and requested support for the amendments and regulations.
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Gayantha Karunathilleka SJB
AI summary A Division was requested by Hon. Gayantha Karunathilleka. Following the request, the Division Bell was rung in accordance with parliamentary procedure.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Presiding Member procedural
- The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Hon. Kumara Jayakody moved an amendment to page 3, lines 13 and 14 of the Bill, substituting wording referring to “The Plan and the Long-Term Transmission Development Plan of the Ceylon Electricity Board.” The amendment was agreed to, and Clause 4, as amended, was ordered to stand part of the Bill before proceedings moved to Clause 5.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved a textual amendment to Clause 5 of the Bill, substituting wording on page 4, line 30 relating to the term “diversified.” The amendment was agreed to, after which Clause 5 as amended and Clauses 6 and 7 were ordered to stand part of the Bill, before the Committee proceeded to consider Clause 8.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved amendments to Clause 8 of the Bill, including a wording change and the insertion of a provision treating the Minister-appointed Committee as a scheduled institution under the Anti-Corruption Act, No. 9 of 2023. The amendments were agreed to, Clause 8 as amended was ordered to stand part of the Bill, and Clauses 9 and 10 proceeded in Committee.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved an amendment to Clause 10 of the Bill, adding language to require that changes to the electricity system be made while ensuring an uninterrupted and reliable electricity supply. The amendment was agreed to, and Clause 10, as amended, was ordered to stand part of the Bill before proceedings moved to Clause 11.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved an amendment to page 13, line 30 of the Bill, substituting wording referring to “competitive ancillary services.” The amendment was agreed to, after which Clause 11 as amended and Clause 12 were ordered to stand part of the Bill, and proceedings moved to Clause 13 concerning amendment of section 17 of the principal enactment.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved a series of amendments to Clause 13 of the Bill concerning subsidiary companies under the relevant electricity sector legislation. The amendments specify Treasury ownership and permanent shareholding arrangements, create board composition requirements for the hydropower generation company and other entities, add expertise requirements including former Ceylon Electricity Board personnel, and introduce conflict-of-interest disclosure and limits on multiple board appointments. The amendments were agreed to, and Clause 13, as amended, was ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Hon. Kumara Jayakody moved several Committee Stage amendments to the Bill, revising provisions on the Final Vesting Plan, employee secondment, and related obligations in the restructuring of electricity sector entities. The amendments shorten certain timelines from two years to one year, extend references to include Pension Fund obligations alongside Employees’ Provident Fund obligations, and require identification, notification, and option procedures for employees of the Generation and Distribution Companies proposed for secondment to subsidiary companies. They also provide that seconded employees must receive terms no less favourable than their existing Ceylon Electricity Board employment conditions, while employees who do not opt for secondment would be entitled to a voluntary retirement scheme.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Moved an amendment to the Bill to replace a line on page 27 so that “strategies and any subsequent revisions and updates published in the Gazette shall be deemed included.” The amendment was agreed to, after which Clause 19 as amended and Clauses 20 and 21 were ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved two new clauses to amend the principal enactment. The first proposed amending section 28 to extend its wording from generation and distribution to include supply, while the second proposed amending section 40 to clarify its applicability to any person or body of persons. The clauses were brought up and read for the first time.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Kumara Jayakody moved that the new clauses be read a second time during consideration of a Bill. The House agreed to add the new clauses, retained the enacting clause and title, and the Bill was reported with amendments.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech → - The Hon. Kumara Jayakody JJB
AI summary Moved that the amended Bill be read a Third time and sought leave to correct linguistic, printing, grammatical, numbering, and consequential errors. The motion was agreed to, and the Bill was read a Third time and passed.
Parliamentary Procedure Full speech →
- 16 Papers Papers: Order under Tobacco Tax Act and Regulations under Tea Act 2 speeches
- 17 Adjournment Adjournment: Parliamentary Adjournment and Adjournment Questions 13 speeches
- 18 Adjournment Closing: Adjournment of Parliament 1 speeches